Monday, April 14, 2014

የኢትዮጵያን ወቅታዊ የፖለቲካ ሁኔታ እና የዲያስፖራውን ሚና በተመለከተ በኖርዌይ ኦስሎ ሕዝባዊ ውይይት ተካሄደ


by admin

በዲምክራሲያዊ ለውጥ በኢትዮጵያ  የድጋፍ ድርጅት ኖርዌይ አዘጋጅነት አፕሪል ቅዳሜ 12/2014  በኖርዌይ ኦስሎ ከተማ  የኢትዮጵያን ወቅታዊ የፖለቲካ ሁኔታ እና የዲያስፖራውን ተሳትፎ በተመለከተ ታላቅ ሕዝባዊ ስብሰባ ተካሄደ:: በሕዝባዊ ስብሰባው ላይ ቁጥራቸው ወደ ሁለት መቶ የሚጠጉ በኖርዌይ የሚኖሩ ኢትዮጵያኖች ከኦስሎ እና ከተለያየ ከተማ  በመምጣት በስብሰባው ላይ የተገኙ ሲሆን  የግንቦት 7 የፍትህ የነፃነት እና የዲሞክራሲ ንቅናቄ አመራር አባል አቶ ቡዙነህ ፅጌ የስብሰባው ተጋባዥ እንግዳ በመሆን ሰፋ ያለ ንግግር አድርገዋል::
ሕዝባዊ ስብሠባው በኖሬጅያውያን የሰአተ አቆጣጠር ከቀኑ 15:00 እስከ ምሽቱ 21:00 ሰዓት የተካሄደ ሲሆን የዲሞክራሲያዊ ለለውጥ የድጋፍ ድርጅት ኖርዌይ ሕዝብ ግንኙነት ሀላፊ  አቶ አቢ አማረ በኢትዮጵያ ውስጥ በወያኔ አረመናዊ ስርአት በጭካኔ በግፍ ለተገደሉ እና በተለያዩ አስር ቤቶች በፖለቲካ ኣስተሳስባችው ምክንያት ያለወንጀላች የሚስቃዩ ውድ ኢትዮጵያዊን ወገኖቻችን በማስብ  በዚሁ ዘረኛ ቡድን አስቃቂ የኣካል ጉዳት ለተፈጸባቸው ኢትዮጵያዊን  የአንድ ደቂቃ የህሊና ጸሎት በማስደረግ ስብሰባውን አስጀምረውታል::

በመቀጠለም አቶ ዮሀንስ አለሙ የዴምክራሲያዊ ለውጥ በኢትዮጵያ የድጋፍ ድርጅት ኖርዌይ ሊቀመንበር የመግቢያ ንግግር ያደረጉ ሲሆን በንግግራቸው ስለ ዲምክራሲያዌ ለውጥ የድጋፍ ድርጅት ኖርዌይ አመሰራረት እና ስለ ድጋፍ ድርጅቱ አላማ በማብራራት የድጋፍ ድርጅቱ በአሁኑ ሰአት በሀገር ቤት በሰላማዊ ትግል የወያኔን መንግስት ለመጣል እየታገሉ ያሉትን የፖለቲካ ድርጅቶችን እየረዳ እንደሚገኝ እና ከሀገር ውጭ ደግሞ የወያኔን መንግስት  በሁለገብ ትግል  ለማስወገድ እየሰራ ያለውን የግንቦት 7 የፍትህ የነፃነት እና የዲሞክራሴ ንቅናቄ የፖለቲካ ድርጅትን በግንባር ቀደምነት እየረዳ እንዳለ በመግለጽ  የወያኔን ዘረኛ ስርአት ለመጣል ሁሉም ሰው አስተዋጿ ማድረግ እንደሚጠበቅበት እና ማንኛውም  ኢትዮጵያዌ ዜጋ በሀገራችን የጋራ ጉዳይ ስለሆነው  የኢትዮጵያ ወቅታዊ የፖለቲካ ሁኔታ ሀሳብ በመለዋወጥ ፣በመካከላችን ያሉትን ማንኛውንም የሃሳብ ልዩነቶች ወደ ኋላ በመጣል ፣ በመቻቻል፣ ሀገር እያፈረሰ እና ሕዝብ እያዋረደ ያለውን የዘረኛውን የወያኔን መንግስት ሁሉም ኢትዮጵያዊ በሁለገብ ትግል ለማስወገድ መረባረብ እንዳለበት አጽኖት ሰተው ንግግር አድርገዋል::
በመቀጠለም ዲምክራሲያዊ ለውጥ የድጋፍ ድርጅት ኖርዌይ ድጋፍ ከሚሰጣቸው ድርጅቶች መካከል አንዱ የግንቦት 7 የፍትህ የነፃነት እና የዲሞክራሲ ንቅናቄ አመራር አባል የሆኑት አቶ ቡዙነህ ፅጌ የስብሰባው ተጋባዥ እንግዳ ሰፊውን ጊዜ በመውሰድ ከንጉሱ ስርአት ጀምሮ በደርግ መንግስት ዘመንም በሀገራችን የተደረጉ የፖለቲካ ንቅናቄዎችንና ለውጦችን አንድ በአንድ በመዘርዘር አሁን ካለው የወያኔ ኢህአዲግ መንግስት ጋር በማነጻጸር ሰፋ ያለ ትንታኔ ያቀረቡ ሲሆን አሁን ላይ ሀገሪቱን እየመራው ነው የሚለው የወያኔ መንግስት ከዚህ ቀድሞ ኢትዮጵያን ከመሩት ከሁለቱ መንግስታቶች ማለትም ከንጉሱም ከደርግም መንግስት ጋር ሲነጻጸር ፈጽሞ እንደማይገናኝ የወያኔ መንግስት ዘረኛና የዘረኝነት ፖለቲካ እያራመደ ያለ አረመናዊ መንግስት እንደሆነ አብራርተዋል::
የግንቦት 7  የፍትህ የነፃነት እና የዲሞክራሲ ንቅናቄ አመራር አባል አቶ ቡዙነህ ፅጌ አክለውም ከወያኔ በፊት የነበሩ ሁለቱ መንግስታቶች ለውድቀት የዳረጓቸውን ምክንያቶች በመጥቀስ የወያኔን አንባ ገነናዊ መንግስት ለአፋጣኝ ውድቀት ሊዳርጉት ይችላሉ የሚሉትን ግልጽ ምክንያቶች በመዘርዘር አስቀምጠዋል:: አቶ ቡዙነህ በሁለት የኢትዮጵያ ወቅታዊ ጉዳዮች ላይ በማንሳት እና በማብራራ ከሕዝብ ውይይት እንዲያደርጉበት ለመወያያ ያቀረቡ ሲሆን እነዚህም
1, በሙስሊሙ ማህበረሰብ እና በወያኔ መካከል ያለው ግጭት
2, የህዳሴ ግድብን  በማስመልከት ያለው ተቃውሞ
ስለሙስሊሙ ማህበረሰብ ተቃውሞ ሲናገሩ የሙስሊሙ ትግል በሁለት አመታት ውስጥ የተደረገው ሰላማዊ ትግል በጣም የተሳካና ወያኔ በቀላሉ ሊያዳፍነው ያልቻለው ሰላማዊ መብትን የመጠየቅ ትግል እንደሚያደንቁ በመናገር ነገር ይህ በሙስሊም ማህበረሰብ በኩል እየተደረገ ያለው ትግል እስከ አሁን ድረስ ከመንግስት በኩል ምንም አይነት መልስ ሊያገኝ እንዳልቻለ እና ወደፊትም ከወያኔ መንግስት በኩል ምንም አይነት መልስ ያገኛል የሚል እምነት እንደሌላቸው ተናግረዋል:: ለዚህም ማስረጃው የኢትዮጵያ ሙስሊሞች ከጠየቋቸው አራት የመብት ጥያቄዎች አንዱም ካለመመለሱ በተጨማሪ እስካሁን መሪዎቻቸውም በሃሰት ውንጀላ በእስር እየማቀቁ ያለፍርድ እየተንገላቱ መሆናቸው ነው፥፥
ነገር ገን አሁን እየሆነው ባለው ሁኔታ በእንደዚህ አይነት መንገድ እስከመቼ ድረስ የሙስሌሙ ትግል ይቀጥላል በማለት የተናገሩ ሲሆን አሁን እየሄደ ባለው አካሄድ የሙስሊሙ ተቃውሞ የትግል አቅጣጫውን እስካልቀየረ ድረስ ረጅም ርቀትን ትግሉ ሊቀጥል ይችላል የሚል እምነት እንደሌላቸው እና ነግር ግን የሙስሊሙ ጥያቄ ከእምነት መብት ጥያቄ ባሻገር ወደ የዜግነትን መብት ወደ ማስከበር መለወጥና መሸጋገር  እናደለበት በመናገር የሙስሊሙ ማእበረሰብ ጥያቄ ፍሬ ሊያፈራ የሚችለው  ትግሉ በዚህ መልኩ ሲቀጥል እንደሆነ ሰፋ ያለ ማብራሪያ ሰተዋል:

በሁለተኛም የህዳሴ ግድብ በሚመለከት  ያቀረቡት ሀሳብ ወያኔ የራሱን የፖለቲካ ኪሳራና በህዝቡ ላይ እያደረሰ ያለዉን ግፍ በዕድገት ስም ለመሸፈን ያመጣዉ እንጂ ታቅዶበትና ለህዝቡ በማሰብ እንዳልሆነ በኢትዮጵያና በህዝቡ ላይ እያደረሰ ያለዉ ግፍ እንደ ማስረጃነት በማቅረብ ያብራሩ ሲሆን እንደ ምሳሌም ወያኔ ሃገራዊ የሆነ አላማ ይዞ ካለመነሳቱ አንፃር የሃገርን ድንበር አሳልፎ እስከመስጠት እየሄደ ያለበትን ሁኔታ ጠቅሰው ይህ አሰራር ደግሞ የዲክታተሮች ባህሪ እንደሆነ አብራርተዋል፥፥

የወያኔ መንግስት በህዳሴ ግድብ ሰበብ ምክንያት በማድረግ በመላው አለም ኢትዮጵያኖች በሚኖሩበት ሀገሮች በመዞር የዲያስፖራውን ቀልብ ለመውሰድ የሚያደርገው የአባይ ቦንድ ሽያጭ ሩጫ በዲያስፖራ ተቃዋሚዎች አማካኝነት በፍጹም እንዳልተሳካለት ይህንንም የወያኔ በአባይ ቦንድ ሽያጭ ስም ገንዘብ ዘረፋ በመቃወም ወያኔን አሳፍረው ከመለሱት መካከል በኖርዌይ የሚኖሩ ኢትዮጵያኖች እንደሆኑ በማስታወስ  የዚህ የህዳሴ ግድብ ግንባታ ሰበብ የወያኔን መንግስት ወደ መጥፎ ውድቀት ላይ ሊጥለው እንደሚችል በማመን የወያኔ መንግስት በአሁን ሰአት ከግብጽ መንግስት ጋር እየገባ ያለው ሰጣ ገባ ለኢትዮጵያ መጥፎ ሊሆን እንደሚችል በመግለጽ ንግግራቸውን አጠቃለዋል፥፥

በመቀጠልም አቶ ብዙነህ ባነሷቸው ነጥቦችና እና በሌሎችም ጉዳዮች ላይ ከስብሰባው ተሳታፊዎች ለቀረበላቸው በርካታ ጥያቄዎች ማብራሪያ የሰጡ ሲሆን ሰፋ ያለ ውይይትም ተደርጓል፥፥ ከውይይቱም በማስቀጠል የዲምክራሲያዊ ለውጥ በኢትዮጵያ የድጋፍ ድርጅት ኖርዌይ ምክትል ሊቀመንበር አቶ ዳንሄል አበበ የዲምክራሲያዌ ለውጥ በኢትዮጵያ የድጋፍ ድርጅት ኖርዌይ የአቋም መግለጫ ንግግር ያደረጉ ሲሆን ድርጅታቸው ወያኔ በኢትዮጵያ ሕዝብ ላይ እያደረሰ ያለውን ግፍና በደል ፈጽመው እንደሚያወግዙ እና ዴምክራሲያዌ ለለውጥ የድጋፍ ድርጅት ኖርዌይ ሁል ጊዜ ከግንቦት 7 የፍትህ የነፃነት እና የዲሞክራሴ ንቅናቄ ጎን እንደሚቆም ቃል በመግባት የአቶ ቡዙነህ ፅጌን በኖርዌይ በመገኛት ለህዝቡ ለሰጡት ገለጻ አመስግነዋል፥፥
በዝግጅቱ መጀመሪያና ማጠቃለያ ላይ የግንቦት 7 ህዝባዊ ሃይል መዝሙር በመዘምራን የተዘመረ ሲሆን በየጣልቃው የተለያዩ የባህል ዘፈኖች በተወዛዋዦች ታጅቦ የቀረበ ሲሆን ጣእም ያለው ባህላዊ ምግብም በዲሞክራሲያዊ ለውጥ በኢትዮጵያ የድጋፍ ድርጅት ኖርዌይ የሴቶች ክፍል ተስተናግዷል፥፥ ስብሰባውን ተጀምሮ እስኪያልቅ አቶ ፍቅሬ አሰፋ መርተውታል::

በመጨረሻም የዲሞክራሲያዊ ለውጥ በኢትዮጵያ የድጋፍ ድርጅት ኖርዌይ ለዝግጅቱ መሳካት የበኩላችሁን ላበረከታችሁና ከተለያዩ የኖርዌይ ከተሞች ረዥም ርቀት በመጓዝ የዝግጅቱ ታዳሚ ለነበራችሁ ውድ ኢትዮጵያውያን እና እንዲሁም የድርጅቱ አባላቶች ታላቅ ምስጋና እናቀርባለን፥፥


ድል ለኢትዮጵያ ህዝብ !

የዲሞክራሲያዊ ለውጥ በኢትዮጵያ የድጋፍ ድርጅት ኖርዌይ

Being Critical toward the Public is Neither a Cultural Taboo nor a Political Insanity


by T.Goshu
1. As an Introduction
Harold S. Kushner (Conquering Fear: Living Boldly in an Uncertain World, 2009) argues,“You have experienced rejection, been fired from a job…, and you fear that the same may happen to you.” And he poses a very challenging question on how to deal with this situation; “How do you cope?”  He reminds us to begin by remembering Victor Frank (Man’s Search for Meaning) who argues, ‘You cannot control what other people do to you, but you can always control   how you respond to what they do.’ 
Kushner underscores fear as one of the main causes for not being able to cope the badexperiences we may face by stating that, “Fear constricts the soul and keep us from being as fully human as God would like us to be.” I strongly argue that this has been the experience for the last two decades, and continues to be the case in our country. And I also respectfully argue that one of the factors for this very unfortunate political trend is the way we deal with the role and self- motivated participation of the people at large. We have been unnecessarily shy at being critical in dealing with the strengths and weaknesses of the people.   We have been unnecessarily non-critical either because of our naïvely perceived social and cultural taboo, or we simply want to be politically correct which is of course not different from the very clumsy sentiment that tells us being critical toward the public is politically insane.   Needless to say, unless we courageously deal with this kind of way of doing politics critically, rationally, honestly, amicably, and constructively; it will be extremely difficult not only to force the tyrannical ruling elites either to play politics with a real sense of civility or step down, but it will also extremely be challenging to build a genuine democratic system after the defeat of the ruthless ruling group by any means.
Let me here be clear that the very purpose of this piece of writing of mine is to forward my points of view on how I look at arguments by many of the politicians, political analysts, scholars and other genuinely concerned citizens about the participation of the people in the process of the struggle for freedom and justice. When I say participation, I do mean towhat extent and how deep and decisive, not just in a very general and politically correct sense.     To put it in other words, my line of argument in this piece is not either to question the decisive role of the people in the making history or to underestimate their involvement and participation in any socio-political engagement and change. I just want to express some points of view that repeatedly come to my mind whenever I try to get a real sense of understanding out of most of the discussions, conversations, arguments, debates, interviews, descriptive and analytical writings on Ethiopian politics and the role of the people (citizens). It goes without saying that when we say the public (people), it does not simply mean and it should not be to mean that people are just a collection of individuals regardless of their strengths and weaknesses. The very essence of the term (public) makes a meaningfully concrete sense when it goes deep down into the very integrated role and participation of each member or citizen. The very position each citizen occupies and the contribution it makes to the general public it belongs has a lot to do with the highest level of societal aspiration and interest we refer as the general will.
I believe the same might be true to genuinely concerned fellow Ethiopians as far as the horrible situation going on in our country, and the question of why and how the people could not bring this extremely puzzling and nightmarish situation to its end is concerned.   Needless to say, unless we want to remain victims of avoidance of the challenges that we do not like to face or self-deceiving attitude and clumsy excuses, the question of how and why the people who justifiably claim to be citizens of a country with glorious history and tradition could bear the horribly unbearable situation for half century (1970s – present) is very hard to comprehend. I respectfully beg to differ from those fellow Ethiopians who knowingly or unknowingly want to stay away from being critical about the unacceptable level of participation by the people themselves in the process of a very challenging struggle for genuine freedom and justice.
I sincerely believe that involving or engaging ourselves in discussion forums, media interviews, debates and dialogues and writing articles of various forms and contents that are truly relevant to the just cause of which the people stand for is a very good and desirable thing. I sincerely believe that the general public is the decisive force in the making of history in general and political history in particular.  However, the way we address the issues, particularly those issues that have a lot to do with a very serious political culture of not walking and acting together as a people should be respectfully rational, wisely articulated, convincingly persuasive, fairly straight-forward and constructively forward-looking; not unnecessarily self-diplomatic, stupidly politically correct, and clumsily passive and pacifist. I wish I could have better words to express the way I comprehend things. But, that is the way it is as far as the very hard fact we are experiencing day -out and day- in is concerned.  And  I sincerely believe that this kind of way of thinking, behaving and acting is critically desirable when it particularly comes to the question of how to approach the public in such a way that things could turn out to be constructive and outstandingly successful.
Now, let me just forward some challenging questions as cases in point: Have we, either as groups or as citizens (people) made meaningful progress in this regard? Have those citizens who have gone to schooling and been educated at the expenses of the Ethiopian tax payers money honestly paid back with whatever they could afford? Have we really tried our best to educate the people why and how they should go beyond merely emotional and instinctive political reactions?  Have we committed ourselves to educating the public that there is an absolute need to appropriately and courageously face and defeat the horrible fear they fear?  Have we engaged the people critically, respectfully, honestly and constructively   as far as the question of what and how the people should play their indispensable role in the process of the struggle for freedom, justice and respect for their basic civil rights is concerned? Do we pretend that the Ethiopian people are politically literate and well aware of the fact that the constitution is a contractual document that governs their relationship with the government they should choose and set up? Are we sure that the majority of the people are not still in a very nightmarish political culture of considering a government and all its machineries above and beyond the law of the land? Aren’t we witnessing that citizens are not courageous and heroic enough even to take part in public gatherings organized by some relatively doing –well opposition parties because of the fear they fear? Have we had a real sense of rationally critical interaction with the people? Have the people (citizens) really put effective, persistent, and meaningfully constructive pressure on those opposition political parties and movements which are trying their best in a very hostile political environment?  We can go on, and on, and on. To my observation and understanding, the answers to all these and other challenging questions do not seem positively sounding let alone satisfactory.
I am well aware that many Fellow Ethiopians may feel uncomfortable with this idea of being critical about the question of whether the people have involved as effective as they should be in the process of the struggle for their political freedom, civil liberty and socio-economic justice or not.   And I am also well – cognizant of the reason for this kind of mentality  in any society leave alone ours that has never had a genuine opportunity to experience what a rational, tolerant, mutually respectful, mutually valuable, and truly forward –looking criticism throughout the history of  our political journey.
2. I want to highlight a couple of more specific aspects that are strongly relevant to the very purpose of this piece of writing of mine. And these are:
2.1. It would be wrong either to disregard or undermine the factors that have a lot to do with negative impacts on the role and participation of the people in the process of making significantly meaningful differences in our political and socio-economic lives.  What are some of these factors? Let me proceed as follows:
A. There is no doubt that one of the very serious contributing factors for our ineffectiveness, if not failure is the age-old history of our political culture. In other words, our claim as people of a country of thousands of glorious history, more specifically not surrendering to foreign invaders and colonizers has never been transformed into the glorious political history of exercising internal political freedom, justice or rule of law, socio-economic advancement and  fairness,  and  a strong sense social cohesion . What is extremely sad is that our political lives have continued horribly suffering under political groups (elites) who have taken the palace at their gun point and have determined to maintain it by any dirty means including state-terror. I am here referring to the military junta and ethnic-based TPLF/EPRDF.  It is here that the very terrible enemy of making meaningful progress comes in. And that enemy is living under a political environment characterized both by perceived and actual fear. And it is absolutely necessary for us to face this ongoing reality, and deal with it accordingly instead of staying “comfortable “with the tendency or mentality of denial and avoidance.
B. Needless to say, that section our society with educational opportunities of various levels itself has been and seems continuing to be politically illiterate if we take the case in the real sense of the term.  I am not talking about the mere academic success stories. I am talking about a real sense of changing the very academic opportunity and success to the material force of tackling the serious challenge the people has to face. It is powerfully true that of one of the very purposes of education is either to prevent or manage a catastrophic situation of any kind (natural or manmade). There is no doubt that the catastrophic situation our country continues to face is manmade (political, legal, moral, socio-economic.)
Unfortunately enough, our intellectuals (the majority) do not seem willing and able to take their ideas to the level that significantly contribute to shortening the untold suffering going on in Ethiopia let alone showing the people how to do things in practical terms ( educating by doing). They seem keep complaining about the weaknesses of this or that political party or movement.  They do not seem wise and courageous enough to equally be critical about the very weaknesses of the people themselves. And this kind of clumsy approach by our intellectuals has contributed to the continuation of the political culture of blame game.  They themselves ( intellectuals) are suffering from an endless, nonsensically categorical, and going- nowhere arguments such as: the non-qualified argument about the question of whether  peaceful or armed struggle or the combination of the two; kind of non-compromising political state of mind  with regard to  the organization of political parties either based on their ethnic identity or on  their collective identity of Ethiopiawinet ;  engaging in a very wrong way of  looking at our history either by totally dismissing the great side of our history or a total denial of the terrible mistakes made throughout our history; and so on and so forth. Simply put, our intellectuals do not seem recognizing the existence of all kinds of political realities (like it or not) and the manifestation of various conflict of interests and ready to deal with them accordingly.  They instead have gotten themselves trapped by the very damaging mentality of either this or that , not moving to the center based on critically rational and mutually beneficial compromise. I am not referring to compromising with the ruling party as such; but among those intellectuals either at individual capacity or leader of a political groups/movements, civic associations or community organizations.
C.  I do not think it is necessary to discuss in length or detail about opposition political parties, coalitions, movements and even civic groups which have terribly and repeatedly failed the people of Ethiopia. No question that this ugly way of doing politics has contributed to the failure of the people as far as the critical issue of shortening the general crisis of our time is concerned. Will the recently inspiring political reawakening being made by some opposition political parties such as UDJ (Andinet) and the Blue (Semaywai) break the unacceptable level of fear and vicious circle of self-defeating silence irreversibly? It remains to be seen. But, we cannot and should not expect things to happen the way we aspire unless we make things happen. And this desperately requires rationally critical, genuinely wise, and mutually respectful political interaction among political groups, between the political groups and the people at large.
D. Although I am once again well-aware that this section of my comment may make my fellow Ethiopians (particularly followers of the Ethiopian Orthodox Church) very uncomfortable, I cannot help, but say it in a rational, respectful and straight-forward manner. Most of our preachers of the Church, including members of the leadership are not truthfully courageous enough to make their teachings relevant to the very question of how to deal with the gross violation human rights in the country they pray for ( God bless Ethiopia) in their regular mass services. They repeatedly recite,” Ethiopia stretches her hands to God” from the Great Book (the Bible); and that is a great thing. However, the problem is when it comes to the question of whether we as citizens of that country we call her our Holy Land truly and honestly do stretch our hands and open our hearts and minds to shorten her untold sufferings. Do not get me wrong here that what I am trying to express is kind of passing judgment which is not and should not be my business at all. What I am trying to say is that our religious values has a lot to do with our essence  of living with freedom, liberty, human dignity, equality and shared prosperity . I am sorry to say but I have to say that our failure in this very aspect of our spiritual lives has contributed to our repeated failure in our secular way of lives. Why? Because we are not leading by example , getting ourselves at the very front of the fight for freedom, respect for fundamental human liberties, natural and legal rights, and safeguarding and passing down a country of proudness to the generation to come.
We preach the people over, and over, and over and over again as if they (the people) cannot do anything, but just pray. And we often listen to our religious teachers and leaders or other clergies to the extent of saying that Ethiopia is in trouble as if her people have committed sin more serious than other believers of the world. Yes, Ethiopians as any members of human beings cannot be free of wrong doings or sins. But, it is absolutely absurd to use this kind of very clumsy religious argument as justification for our own terrible weaknesses to make genuine and meaningful contributions to fight against all evil-driven situation going on in our country.  It is so desirable and great to witness many members of this generation seeking for spiritual satisfaction and becoming parts of the role being played by the Church. However, it is not wrong to be concerned about witnessing our religious leaders going to the contrary which could make the young ones vulnerable to not to be what it should be, but pretend to be. Simply put, as the Ethiopian people are so religious, they desperately need a religious leadership that helps them get out of the hell on this planet, not only life after death.
2.2. I want to say some points of view with regard to the weaknesses of the people themselves before I sum up my piece of writing. I want here to note that this view point of mine does not by any means disregard the courageous efforts being made by individuals and groups to take the struggle for freedom and justice a step forward.
I strongly believe that for the people to be successful in getting their political and socio –economic situations right, they need a leadership that should win their trust and loyalty. There is no and there should not be any confusion in this regard. Any target-full movement cannot be effective without some sort of organizational structure and function leave alone a very challenging movement for political freedom and justice.  However, on the other hand, a political party or movement without a meaningful participation that includes self- motivated engagement can go nowhere. It (a political party or movement) desperately needs a serious and practical support that should come from the people who vehemently refuse to live under ruling elites who are determined to stay in power by crashing or destroying their very essence being human.   Are we witnessing this magnitude of self-motivated reawakening in a serious sense of the term? We may come up with all kinds of justification why this is not the case we are witnessing. But, this does not change the reality that the people are victims of the very dehumanizing fear employed by the tyrannical ruling circle. Imagine what happened in Tunisia. A collage graduate young man who was forced to be a street vender was harassed by the police force of his own home city. He put fire himself on fire and powerfully demonstrated how death is better than living with an extremely painful life. Were the people of Tunisia starving worse than we do, and had they have a well-organized political party in a real sense of the tem? Not at all! Imagine what we as the people had done when teacher Yenesew Gebre had demonstrated the same, if not the worst magnitude of the sufferings of the people.  Had the people of Ethiopia showed a real sense of outrage and frustration let alone a serious signal about their discontent? I am not talking about kinds of emotional way of expressions here and there that could happen in very on and off manner. I am talking about the need at least to rally around opposition political parties and make them the centers of togetherness and progress towards achieving the destination we desperately aspire.
Imagine how citizens are badly gripped by an incredible level of fear when they remain silent or keep murmuring deep inside while their children go to school ( I don’t know what kind of learning)  with their empty stomachs and fainted in their class rooms.
Imagine how it is very difficult to comprehend when citizens including those who has nothing to lose get scared of being seen with their friends who belong to the opposition political parties leave alone attending and participating in public gathering organized by those parties. I could continue enumerating many cases of weaknesses from the side of the public (citizens). But, I do not think it is necessary to do so as we experience them in our day-to –day lives.
Let me conclude with a quotation I borrowed from Carne Ross’s book, The Leaderless Revolution: How Ordinary People Will Take Power and Change Politics in the 21st Century, 2011. He argues, “Our silence permits this outrage to continue, and profound injustice to be perpetuated. And it is this silence that must be now broken, through a thousand acts of construction to build a better world, a thousand acts that declare there is a much, much better way of organizing and deciding our lives together. Though peaceful, these are revolutionary acts.”

The Long Shadow of Rwanda on (Central) Africa


Déjà vu 1994 Rwanda in 2014 Central African Republic
Last week, the people of Rwanda began a solemn week of official mourning to commemorate the 20th anniversary of the Rwanda Genocide. On April 6, 1994, Hutu extremist leaders in government, their political supporters and organized militiamen coordinated a systematic killing spree, which lasted over 100 days and consumed the lives of more than 800,000 mostly ethnic Tutsis and moderate Hutus. In 1994, Rwanda had a population of  5.5 million, of which 14 percent were Tutsi. Today Rwanda has a population of 11.5 million, of which the Tutsi population is less than 10 percent.Last week, the people of Rwanda began a solemn week of official mourning to commemorate the 20th anniversary of the Rwanda Genocide.
Last week, the people of the Central African Republic (CAR) continued to face their own “Rwanda-esque” nightmare of unspeakable horror. United Nations Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon was so disheartened by the ongoing “ethno-religious cleansing” in CAR that he declared, “The international community failed the people of Rwanda 20 years ago… And we are at risk of not doing enough for the people of the CAR today . . . Some say this is a forgotten crisis. I am here to help make sure the world does not forget… And we are at risk of not doing enough for the people of the CAR today… Atrocity crimes are being committed in this country. Ethno-religious cleansing is a reality. Most members of the Muslim minority have fled. We cannot just continue to say ‘never again’. This, we have said so many times. We must act concertedly and now to avoid continued atrocities on a massive scale…”
Twenty years ago when Rwandan President Juvénal Habyarimana, a Hutu, died after his plane was shot down, Hutu extremists who opposed a 1993 ceasefire agreement for power sharing Hutus and Tutsis for the creation of a power-sharing government launched their “final war” to “exterminate the [Tutsi] cockroaches.’ The “akazu” (top Hutu political leaders and elites) began hatching a concerted plan to exterminate Tutsis at least a year before the onset of the genocide. They set up their own radio station (Radio Télévision Libre des Mille Collines) and began a virulent and systematic campaign of demonization of Tutsis and moderate Hutus. At the onset of the genocide in April 1994, they used their radio station to embolden and encourage the killers. They read out the names of people to be killed and directed murderous militias (Interahamwe and Impuzamugambi) to different locations to commit horrific crimes. They repeatedly proclaimed on radio, “In truth, all Tutsis will perish. They will vanish from this country … They are disappearing little by little thanks to the weapons hitting them, but also because they are being killed like rats.” In 1994, there were about 120,000 people living in Nyamata, the largest city in Rwanda located 30 miles from the capital Kigali. In less than a month and a half, only 50,000 were left. Five out of every six Tutsis had been killed.
Today, CAR has exploded into sectarian and communal strife and civil war. In 2013, Seleka militia (an alliance of rebel militia factions that overthrew the CAR government in March 2013) launched “a murderous rampage that started in the north-east and spread out across the country, seizing the capital Bangui and ousting then-President François Bozizé. Over the following 10 months, Seleka forces killed countless civilians, burned numerous villages, and looted thousands of homes.” Although an estimated 90 per cent of  CAR’s population is Christian including the ousted president Bozizé, most of the Seleka forces and their leader Michel Djotodia are Muslims. According to Amnesty International, Seleka “abuses spurred the emergence of the loosely organized “anti-balaka” militia (“machete proof” in Sango), made up of Christians and animists. In the last four months of 2013, anti-balaka fighters carried out horrific attacks on Muslim communities, particularly in CAR’s northwest.” The violence has continued to intensify and currently international peacekeepers have “failed to prevent the ethnic cleansing of Muslim civilians in the western part of the Central African Republic.” In the town of Yaloke, less than 150 miles from the capital Bangui, there were an estimated 30,000 Muslims with 8 mosques a year ago . According to Human Rights Watch observers, today  there are fewer than 500 Muslims and one mosque left.
For the past year, the international human rights organizations have been ringing the alarm bells over the impending “ethno-religious cleansing”-cum-genocide in the CAR. In October 2013, Amnesty International issued a report warning of the “human rights crisis in CAR is spiraling out of control.” As the violence and carnage increased, a token force of several thousand international peacekeepers (2,000 French troops and some  6,000 African Union forces) was sent to CAR. Last week, the U.N. authorized the deployment of 12,000 peacekeepers to CAR but that force will not arrive until September 2014. Human Rights Watch issued a dire warning indicating that the extreme level of violence in CAR is “forcing entire communities to leave the country. At this rate, if the targeted violence continues, there will be no Muslims left in much of the Central African Republic.”
The parallels between 1994 Rwanda and 2014 CAR are chilling. In 1994 Rwanda, the Organization of African Unity and the  international community including the U.S. and the U.N. turned a blind eye to the spiraling genocide. In 2014 CAR, the international community is giving lip service and performing window dressing with token military presence as tens of thousands of innocent civilians are being massacred and hundreds of thousands displaced in “ethno-religious cleansing”. For a full year, it was manifest to the African Union and the international community that a backlash in CAR was foreseeable and preventable. Amnesty International noted,  “In power for nearly 10 months, the Seleka were responsible for massacres, extrajudicial executions, rape, torture, and looting, as well as massive burning and destruction of Christian villages. As the Seleka withdrew, the international forces allowed the anti-balaka militias to take control of town after town. The resulting violence and forcible expulsion of Muslim communities were predictable.”
Doomed by history?
Has Africa learned its lessons from 1994 Rwanda? Does the world care about Africa? Is Africa condemned to live in the long shadow of Rwanda? Are we witnessing Rwanda 1994 in CAR 2014? What is the difference between “ethno-religious cleaning” and genocide (the same difference between tomAto and tomayto)? Is CAR Rwanda redux? Was Rwanda the future of CAR, and CAR the future of Africa?
There is not a single country in Africa that is immune from the Ebola virus of communalism and sectarianism. Like Ebola, the initial symptoms of communalism and sectarianism appear to be not out of the ordinary. Those who claim to struggle against ethnic and religious oppression often proclaim righteousness. When they become the victors, they commit equally or more atrocious crimes that make a travesty of their cause and causes the deaths and suffering of millions. Like the Ebola virus, communalism and sectarianism are a deadly combination in the body politics of Africa. A vaccine must be found soon if Africa is to be spared the scourge of sectarianism and communalism.
The specter of genocide and crimes against humanity in Africa
In his “Communist Manifesto”, Karl Marx announced to the world that “A spectre is haunting Europe — the specter of communism.” In a metaphorical equivalent, “A specter is haunting Africa – the specter of genocide and crimes against humanity.” Marx declared, “The history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggles.” Is the future of Africa going to be a struggle against genocide and crimes against humanity?
Article 5 (a) of the Rome Statute grants prosecutorial jurisdiction to the International Criminal Court over the crimes of genocide and crimes against humanity. Article 6 defines “genocide” to include specific “acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group.” These acts include, among others, “killing or causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group, deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part.
Article 7 defines crimes against humanity which includes “murder, enslavement, deportation or forcible transfer of population, imprisonment or other severe deprivation of physical liberty in violation of fundamental rules of international law, torture, rape, and persecution against any identifiable group or collectivity on political, racial, national, ethnic, cultural, religious, gender.
Crimes against humanity and mini-genocides are commonplace occurrences in Africa today. With the exception of the international human rights organizations, few Africans (including leaders and members of the African intelligentsia) and fewer Western media and diplomatic communities are prepared to talk about the genocide and crimes against humanity taking place in Africa. In April 1994, when the Clinton Administration pretended to be ignorant of the unspeakable massacres in Rwanda, Susan Rice, President Obama’s current national Security Advisor, casually inquired of her colleagues, “If we use the word ‘genocide’ and are seen as doing nothing, what will be the effect on the November [congressional] election?”
Beginning in 2003, the Sudanese government exploited tribal/ethnic differences in the Darfur region pitting nomadic Arab herders against pastoralist African groups. The Sudanese government armed ethnic Arab militia groups, known as the “Janjaweed,” (not unlike Rwanda’s Interahamwe) to attack the ethnic African groups.  As the government rained bombs from the sky, the Janjaweed burned villages, poisoned wells, raped and  massacred over one-half million people and displaced millions more. In 2009, the International Criminal Court issued an arrest warrant for Sudanese President Omar al-Bashir and other officials for directing a campaign of mass killing, rape and pillage against civilians in Darfur. Bashir sneered at the ICC indictment,  “Tell them all, the ICC prosecutor, the members of the court and everyone who supports this court that they are under my shoes.”
Uhuru Kenyatta, along with other co-defendants including his deputy president William Ruto, is currently facing trial in the ICC for his alleged role in masterminding the post-election violence in Kenya in late 2007 and early 2008. Over 1,100 people are believed to have died in that violence and 600 thousand displaced.  Kenyatta is charged in a five-count indictment under the Rome Statute for crimes against humanity including murder, deportation or forcible transfer, rape, persecution and other inhumane acts. However, Uhuru Kenyatta will never see the inside of the ICC courtroom in The Hague. Truth be told, it is not only Kenyatta and his partners in crimes against humanity who have escaped justice. Many other “genocidaires” and criminals against humanity in Africa have thumbed their noses on the ICC and other tribunals and gotten away.
In southern Ethiopia, the indigenous people along the Omo River valley are facing extinction as a result of displacement and villagization caused by the construction of the so-called Gibe III dam. In August 2012, the world-renowned conservationist and paleoanthropologist Dr. Richard Leakey predicted that the Gibe III “dam will produce a broad range of negative effects, some of which would be catastrophic to both the environment and the indigenous communities living downstream.” Is the regime in Ethiopia culpable for genocide and crimes against humanity for constructing a dam that certainly damns the indigenous people of the Omo River Basin?
In western Ethiopia, the people of Gambella have lost their ancestral lands and homes to Indian multinationals. The regime in Ethiopia “leased” to an Indian corporation known as Karuturi  “2,500 sq km of virgin, fertile land  an area the size of Dorset, England” in Ethiopia  for £150 a week ($USD245). To make way for Karuturi, tens of thousands of Ethiopians in Gambella were forced to move and become part of the regime’s  villagization program. A UNICEF field study concluded: “ The deracination [uprooting from ancestral lands] of indigenous people  that is evident in rural areas of Gambella is extreme. It is very likely that Anuak (and possibly other indigenous minorities) culture will completely disappear in the not-so-distant future.” Is the regime in Ethiopia responsible for genocide and crimes against humanity in its use of villagization policy in Gambella?
For nearly a quarter of a century, the regime in Ethiopia has been repackaging an atavistic style of  tribal politics in a fancy wrapper called “ethnic federalism.” The regime has managed to segregate the Ethiopian people by ethno-tribal classifications and corralled them like cattle into  grotesque regional political units called “kilils” (literally means “reservation”; semantically, the word also suggests the notion of an exclusion zone, an enclave). The ideology of “kililism” shares many of the attributes of Apartheid’s “Bantustanism” (“black African tribal homelands”). Both ideologies aim to concentrate members of designated ethnic groups into “homelands” by creating ethno-linguistically homogenous territories which could ultimately morph into  “autonomous” nation states. “Kililistization” is “villagization” on steroids; it reduces Ethiopia to a bunch of glorified villages. “Kilils” are basically a kinder-and-gentler form of Apartheid-style Bantustans. Is “kililism” the seedbed of genocide and crimes against humanity? Is the regime in Ethiopia responsible for genocide and crimes against humanity for its “kililization” policy?
For over a decade, the regime in Ethiopia, despite claims of “ethnic federalism”, has mounted an indiscriminate counterinsurgency campaign in the Ogaden region of Ethiopia to suppress the Ogadenis basic demands for autonomy. The regime has adopted policies aimed at starving the Ogadeni population and economically blockade Ogadeni towns and villages. The regime has indiscriminately strafed and bombed Ogadeni civilians and cut off humanitarian aid to the region. Massacres, torture, rape and disappearances have been used as weapons of war by the regime against Ogadenis.  Human Rights Watch issued a 130 page report entitled, “Collective Punishment: War Crimes and Crimes against Humanity in the Ogaden area of Ethiopia’s Somali Region” documenting the regime’s crimes. Is the regime in Ethiopia responsible for genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes in the Ogaden?
In 2005, the regime in Ethiopia orchestrated the massacre of hundreds of unarmed protesters in the aftermath of parliamentary elections in May of that year. Police and security officials under the personal and direct command and control of the late Meles Zenawi and his top officials coordinated the massacres. An official Inquiry Commission appointed by Meles documented the extrajudicial killing of at least 193 unarmed protesters, wounding of 763 others and arbitrary imprisonment of nearly 30,000 persons. The Commission’s evidence further showed that nearly all of the 193 unarmed protesters were killed by the regime’s sharpshooters.  The Commission further documented that on November 3, 2005, during an alleged disturbance at the infamous Kality prison near Addis Ababa, guards sprayed more than 1,500 bullets into inmate cells in 15 minutes, killing 17 and severely wounding 53.  Was Meles personally responsible for crimes against humanity? Are those officials currently in the regime or others who participated but are no longer in the regime responsible for crimes against humanity in the 2005 massacres?
In May 2012, Meles hectored his rubberstamp parliament to justify his forced expulsion (or as some have described it “ethnic cleansing”) of Amharas from southern Ethiopia and zapped his critics for their irresponsibility in reporting and publicizing it. Meles said the “Amharas” or as he described them the “sefaris from North Gojam” (how humiliating to be called a “safari” or “squatter” in one’s own country!) had to be removed from their homesteads in the south purely out of environmental conservation concerns. There was not a scintilla of evidence that the removal was justified by environmental concerns. Was Meles personally responsible for crimes against humanity for forcibly removing thousands of “Amharas” from the southern part of their country?
Last April, the regime in Ethiopia authorized the forced removal of “Amharas” from the Benishangul-Gumuz region (one of the nine “kililistans” in Ethiopia) in act widely described as “ethnic cleansing”.  Prof. Yacob Hailemariam, a prominent Ethiopian opposition leader and a former senior Prosecutor for the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda commented that the expulsion of members of the Amhara ethnic group  from Benishangul-Gumuz was a de facto ethnic cleansing. “The forceful deportation of people because they speak a certain language could destabilize a region, and if reported with tangible evidence, the UN Security Council could order the International Criminal Court to begin to examine the crimes.”
Large swaths of Ethiopia today are afflicted by famine and starvation which the regime has kept secret for a long time. In February of this year, the regime bureaucratically announced that  2.7 million of the 91 million people in Ethiopia are starving and in need of humanitarian aid. The total food requirement (which in the past the regime has low-balled) is estimated at 388,635 metric tons. The regions most affected by famine  include Gambella (16.7%) , Somali (13.8%), Tigray (11.3%) and Afar (10%). The regime has budgeted only $51.6 million dollars, which  represents only 12.8 percent of what is required. As the alarm over the impending famine was being broadcast, Hailemariam Desalegn, the ceremonial prime minster, was crowing about  a “double digit economic growth”. Thousands of Ethiopians are dying from starvation every month unseen and unregistered because the regime maintains a complete chokehold on information coming from famine afflicted areas. Is the regime in Ethiopia responsible for genocide for the famine deaths by benign neglect and depravity for failing to properly budget when it had had full advance knowledge of the impending food catastrophe?
Since the regime in Ethiopia took power in May 1991, it has been engaged in inflammatory ethnic talk demonizing “Amharas” and others. As recently as a few months ago, the regime was coordinating and  orchestrating a full-court press demonization and vilification campaign against Atse Menelik II, the Nineteenth Century Ethiopian emperor whose centennial is being celebrated this year (Ethiopian calendar). The regime was  using Menelik as the straw man to methodically organize a campaign to incite hatred and ill-will between members of ethnic groups. The incitement campaign was conducted largely through regime lackey-proxies, stooges and puppets. Through its minions, the regime has used the most loathsome words, inflammatory rhetoric and repugnant imagery to describe Menelik’s alleged brutality. One hundred years after his death, the regime has tried to resurrect Menelik as the devil incarnate. What is the purpose of such propaganda? Is inflammatory rhetoric calculated to stoke the fires of ethnic strife a crime against humanity?
The late Meles Zenawi was a man of much intelligence (if his foreign cheerleaders including Susan Rice and Clare Short are to be believed) and little wisdom and common sense. He liked to play with the specter of genocide as much as little children like to invoke the mythical bogeyman to scare each other. In 2010, Meles not only defiled and desecrated the memory of the Rwandan Genocide victims but also tried to take political advantage by resurrecting through inflammatory rhetoric the ghastly ghosts of Rwanda comparing the Voice of America Amharic Service to  Radio Mille Collines of Rwanda. Meles said, “We have been convinced for many years that in many respects, the VOA Amharic Service has copied the worst practices of radio stations such as Radio Mille Collines of Rwanda in its wanton disregard of minimum ethics of journalism and engaging in destabilizing propaganda.” Zenawi used the bogus “genocide” excuse to spend millions of dollars to jam broadcasts of VOA Amharic into Ethiopia, precious resources that could have been used to aid famine victims and provide health care and education.
Such were the outrageous words that dripped from Meles’ mealy-mouth. When Meles said “the VOA Amharic Service has copied the worst practices of radio stations such as Radio Mille Collines”, what was his real message, the message between the lines? Was he asserting that the Amharic service has called for a “final war” and the “extermination” of some Ethiopians like “cockroaches”, “vermins” and “rats”?  Who are the “genocidaires” in the country being mobilized by the VOA transmissions?  Was he saying that the Amharic service is directing and coordinating murderous militias and groups for genocidal activities to make sure that some Ethiopians “will perish and vanish from the country.” Meles was intentionally using the Rwanda Genocide for political purposes; in effect he was trying to convince Ethiopians and his foreign bankrollers that without him and his regime Ethiopia will be another Rwanda. Any regime that seeks to cling to power by  invoking the specter of genocide must eternally be opposed!
Every African man and woman must struggle to invent a thousand and one reasons to hope
Genocide and crimes against humanity in any African country must be regarded as genocide and crimes against humanity in every African country. The Rwanda genocide is an African genocide.  It is not a crime inflicted against Tutsis and moderate Hutus. It is a dastardly crime committed against all Africans and humanity. It is a crime that has left deep and indelible scars on the soul of every living African. Africans must remember, not despair. To paraphrase Elie Wiesel, the Holocaust Survivor and Nobel Peace Laureate, “All Africans must remember the killers. Each African must remember the victims, even as they individually struggle to invent a thousand and one reasons to hope.  Because we remember, we despair. Because we remember, we have the duty to reject despair. Hope is possible beyond despair.”
The crucible for genocide and crimes against humanity is the human heart
The genocide in Rwanda did not begin on April 6, 1994 when machete-wielding thugs began roaming the streets. The seeds of that genocide were planted decades before in the hearts of misguided and spiteful Rwandans regardless of ethnicity. Hate and bigotry have neither race nor religion.  Genocide slowly germinates in the minds of men and women who nurse  hatred and anger and silently sizzle in frustration. Like mushrooms that grow in the darkness of the cave, the seeds of the genocide mushroom in the darkness of the heart. Africans must not despair; they must remember the message of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.  “Darkness cannot drive out darkness; only light can do that. Hate cannot drive out hate; only love can do that.” Only the sunlight of truth can illuminate the dark heart.
Silence and indifference are the oxygen of genocide and crimes against humanity
Genocide and crimes against humanity are quintessentially crimes of silence and crimes of indifference.  The great powers were silent witnesses to the genocide in Rwanda. They knew exactly what was going on beginning on April 6, 1994. They chose to remain silent. The African Union, the U.N and the European Union chose to remain silent, but they knew. The slaughter continued for over 100 days and cost the lives of 800 thousand people because those who could have stopped it did not care.  Africans must not wait for others to save them. They must save themselves from themselves. That is why all Africans must be of a single mind in condemning those who promote ethnic hatred and religious intolerance; they must actively resist those who demonize individuals and groups on the basis of race, ethnicity, religion, language, gender or any other pernicious classification.
Truth and justice before reconciliation
Jean Bosco Mutangana, a Rwandan prosecutor in charge of that country’s international crimes unit recently said, “In our lifetime we shall continue to pursue them, and those who come after us will continue to pursue them. You cannot have reconciliation without real, true justice being done.” That is a message for all Africans.  Justice and truth/reconciliation are two faces of the same coin. Whichever way the coin is tossed, it shows only one face of human rights. Nelson Mandela said, “Reconciliation means working together to correct the legacy of past injustice.” Past injustices are what cast long dark shadows on the future and fate of Africa.
The responsibility to educate
Commemorating the victims of genocide in Rwanda and Darfur and condemning “ethno-religious cleansing” in CAR is not enough. Africa’s young people must be educated about genocide and crimes against humanity. Such information must be part of the curriculum in every African school, college and university. Ignorance is the fertilizer of genocide and crimes against humanity. Ban Ki-moon told the people of Rwanda, “We must not be left to utter the words ‘never again’, again and again”. These are empty words that come too late to aid the innocent men, women and children of CAR who have already lost their lives and those desperately fleeing to save their lives.
Instead of criticizing and antagonizing the international human rights organizations, African leaders should invite and challenge them to help create human rights education for young Africans who could in turn use their training and knowledge to empower their peer groups and communities with knowledge, skills and attitudes that promote universally recognized human rights principles. Human rights education is the sine qua non and a prerequisite for the resolution of conflict in Africa. Those who do not learn from the genocide and crimes against humanity of the past are doomed to repeat them.
Africa’s short men and their long shadows
Scholars say the problem of governance in Africa is “Big Man” rule where leaders privatize the state and use state resources to service their clients in the general population who in turn help them cling to power.  I believe the problem of African governance is the opposite. An old saying teaches, “You know it is near sunset when short men cast long shadows.” There are too many short men in high offices in Africa pretending to be Big Men and great leaders. The short men of Africa are in fact leaders of wolf packs who prey on the people. They are small men of little intelligence and boundless malevolence. They are short men with little vision and infinite power obsession. They are small men with little compassion; they  brim with hate and aggression. These short men in Africa are not only bad leaders but also bad men, bad human beings. They cast long shadows and have made Africa a “dark continent”. “Old sins cast long shadows.” The sins of the small men cast long dark shadows of war, genocide and crimes against humanity in Africa. It is the duty of every African to stand tall over Africa’s short men and obliterate their long dark shadows with the bright sunlight of love, truth, tolerance, harmony, justice and reconciliation.
I remember Rwanda 1984. I remember the Central African Republic 2014. Hope is possible beyond despair.
Professor Alemayehu G. Mariam teaches political science at California State University, San Bernardino and is a practicing defense lawyer.
Previous commentaries by the author are available at:
Amharic translations of recent commentaries by the author may be found at: