Tuesday, January 14, 2014

አሳዛኙ የትውልድ ህይወት በሳውዲ አረቢያ «ጂዛን» ከተማ!

ጂዛን እየተባለ በሚጠራ የሳውዲ አረቢያ ግዛት ውስጥ ህጋዊ የመኖሪያ ፈቃድ የሌለውን ጨምሮ ከ50 ሺህ በላይ ኢትዮጵያውያን እንደሚኖሩ ይነገራል። የጂዛን ከተማ ሳውዲ አረቢያን ከየመን የሚያዋስን ከተማ እንደመሆኗ በባህር የሚመጡ ብዛት ያላቸው ኢትዮጵያውያን ወደ ሪያድ እና ጅዳ ከተማ ለማቅናት በመሸጋገሪያነት እንደሚጠቀሙባት ይነገራል።
በዚች የድንበር ከተማ አያሌ ኢትዮጵያውያን ጉዳዩ በወል በማይታወቅ ምክንያት ያለ ፍርድ ለ 4 እና 5 አመታት ታስረው የሚሰቃዩባት ከተማ መሆኗን የሚነገሩ ውስጥ አዋቂ ምንጮች ወደ ሃገር ለመመለስ ጥያቄ ያቀርቡ አያሌ ወገኖቻችንም በሪያድ የኢትዮጵያን ኤንባሲ እና ለጅዳ ቆንስላ ጽ/ቤት ያቀረቧቸው ጥያቄዎች እስካሁንም ምላሽ ባለማግኘቱ ህይወታቸው አደጋ ውስጥ መሆኑን ይናገራሉ ። ይህ በዚህ እንዳለ ከሁሉም በላይ እስከፊ አስከፊ በለው የሚገልጹት ምንጮች ከሶስት አመት በፊት በደረሰባት ከባድ የመኪና አደጋ ከወገቧ በታች በድን «ፓራላይዘድ» እንደሆነች የሚነገርላት ኢትዮጵያዊት እህት በዚህ ከተማ ውስጥ በተለምዶ «ኦድ ደርብ » እይተባለ በሚጠራ አካባቢ የሚገኝ አንድ ሆስፒታል ውስጥ ላለፉት ሶስት አመታት የአልጋ ቁራኛ ሆና ሃገር እና ወገን አልባ ሆና ሆስፒታል ውስጥ ለመኖር መገደዷ የአብዛኛውን ወገን ልብ የነካ መሆኑን ምንጮች አክለው ይገልጻሉ ።
በተለይ ስለጉዳዩ በሪያድ የኢትዮጵያ ኤንባሲ እና ለጅዳ ቆንስላ ጽ/ቤት መረጃ እንዳላቸው የሚናገሩ ወገኖች የመንግስት ባለስልጣናቱ ዝምታን መምረጣቸው ለወገን ህይወት ደንታ የሌላቸው ሃላፊነት የጎደላቸው መሆናቸውን ያሳያል ብለዋል። የተጠቀሰችው ኢትዮጵያዊት ወጣት በአካሏ ላይ ለደረሰው አስከፊ የመኪና አደጋ «ኢንሹራስ» ካሳ ሳታገኝ ይቅርታ እንዳደረገች ተድረጎ ሆስፒታል ውስጥ እንዳስፈረሞት የሚገልጹት ምንጮች ወጣቷ አደጋው ከደረሰባት ግዜ ጀምሮ ወደ ሃገር ለመግባት ያደረገችው ጥረት በሳውዲ አረቢያ የኢትዮጵያ የመግንስት ዲፕሎማቶች ድጋፍ እና ትብብር ማጣት ለበለጠ ስቃይ መዳረጓን ገልጸዋል። ወጣቷ በቤት ሰራተኝነት ከ አራት አመት በፊት ወደ ሳውዲ አረቢያ እንደገባች የሚነገርላት ወጣት ከዲጃ መሓመድ ሑሴን ትውልድ እና እድገቷ በአማራ ብ\ክ\መ\የኦሮሚያ ማህበረሰብ ዞን “ደዌ” ከሚባል አካባቢ በመሆኑ ከአረብኛ እና ከኦሮምኛ ቋንቋ ውጭ መናገር እንደማትችል የሚገልጹት ምንጮች ወጣቷ በአሁኑ ግዜ በተፈጠረው አጋጣሚ ህይወቴ ሳታልፍ ከቤተሰቦቼ ጋር እንድገናኝ እርዱኝ እያለች ብትማጸንም እስካሁን ምላሽ እንዳላገኘች ይናገራሉ።
ይህ በዚህ አንድ ወጣት ካሊዶ ኣሕመድ የተባለ ኢትዮጵያዊ በተመሳሳይ አደጋ በጂዛን ጀነራል ሆስፒታል ያልጋ ቁራኛ ከሆነ ድፍን ሁለት ኣመት ከስድስት ወራት እንዳስቋጠረ የሚናገሩ ምንጮች ወጣቱ ፓራላይዝ ከመሆኑም በላይ አይናገርም፣ አይሰማም፣ አያይም። እጅና እግሩ ከብረት አልጋው ጋር ተያይዞ እንድሚገኝ ገልጸዋል ። ወጣቱ ለረጅም ግዜ በመተኛት በሚፈጠር የሰውነት መቆሳሰል የተነሳ ወጣቱ በተጨማሪ በህክምናው አነጋገር \በድ ሶርስ\ በተባለ መጎሳቆሉን ይናገራሉ። ወጣቱን ሳይንሳዊው ህክምና አሳስሮ ወይም በቁሙ ገንዞ እንዳሰቀመጠው የሚናገሩ እነዚሁ የአይን እማኞች የጂዛን ትራፊክ ፅ\ቤት በተደጋጋሚ ለጅዳ እና ሪያድ የኢትዮጵያ ኤንባሲ ቢያሳውቁም እስካሁን ወጣቱን ማንም ያየው እንደሌለ ይናገራሉ ።
በቀርቡ ጅዳ እና በጂዛን ከተማ የሚኖሩ ከስደት ተመላሽ ኢትዮጵያውያን ወገኖቻችንን እሮሮ አስመልክቶ በተከታታይ እየዘገበ በሚገኘው በጅዳ የጀርመን ራዲዮ ድምጽ «ጋዜጠኛ ነብዩ ሲራክ» ዘገባ የተበሳጩ በጅዳ የኢትዮጵያ መንግስት ዲፕሎማቶች ጋዜጠኛውን ህገወጥ በሆነ መንገድ ወገኑንን በነጻ ለማገልገል በጸሃፊነት ተመርጦ ሲሰራ ከነበረበት ወገን ለወገን ከሚል አንድ ግዜያዊ ኮሚቴ ማገዳቸው የሚታወስ ነው።
Ethiopian Hagere ከጅዳ በዋዲ ብፌስቡክ በኩል ለጎልጉል: የድረገጽ ጋዜጣ የላኩት
Ethiopian in Saudi

የመረጃ ነፃነት ? …. (ይድነቃቸው ከበደ )


‹‹ ሕዝቡ እኔ ማን እንደሆንሁ ይላል ? ›› በማለት እየሱስ ክርስቶስ መረጃ ይጠይቃል ፤ ደቀመዛምርቶችም ስለሱ የተባለውን አንድም ሳያስቀሩ ይነግሩታል፡፡ እሱም መልሱ እንዲህ ይላቸዋል ‹‹ እናንተስ እኔ ማን እንደሆንሁ ትላላችሁ ? ››አላቸው ፡፡ እነሱም መለሱለት፡፡ ሙሉ ታሪኩ ሉቃስ 9ቁ 18 ላይ ይገኛል ፡፡Yidnekachew Kebede
መረጃ አይናቅም አይደነቅም ማለት እንዲህ ነው፡፡ በመሰረቱ ክርስቶስ ሰዎች ስለሱ ምን እንዳሉ ብቻ ሳይሆን ምን እያሰብ እንደነበር የሚያውቅ አምላክ ነው፡፡ ግን መጠየቅ እና መመለስ አሳብን መግለፅ የሰው ልጅ ተፈጥሯዊ ባህሪ ነው፡፡ ለዚህም ነው ክርስቶ እንደሰው በምድር በተመላለሰበት ወቅት መረጃ ይጠይቅ የነበረው እሱም ስለራሱ መረጃ ይሰጥ የነበረው፡፡ እርግጥ ነው ክርስቶስ ይህን ሲጠይቅ የራሱ ምክንያት አለው፡፡
በመሆኑም ሃሳብ መግለፅ ተፍጥራዊ መብት ነው ወደሚለው ዓለም አቀፍ ስምምነት በመደረሱ የመናገር ሃሳብን የመግለፅ ነፃነት የዲሞክራሲ ዋና የድም ስር ነው የተባለው፡፡ ስለዚህም ተሰባስቦ መቃወም እንዲሁም መደገፍ ፣ አንድ ሰው የሚመስለውን ሃሳብ በፈለገው መንገድ መግለፅ፣ የመምረጥና የመመረጥ፣ መንግስትን የመተቸት፣ በራስ ፍቃድ የመናገረ እና ያለመናገር ፣ በዓልንና አይማኖትን መከተልና ማስፋፋት እንዲሁም ህግ ለሁሉም የሚሰራ ስለመሆኑ መረጋገጥ እና የመሳሰሉት ሁሉ ተግባራዊ የሚሆነው ተአቅቦ ያልተደረገበት የመናገርና የመረጃ መብት ልውውጥ ተግባሪዊ ሲሆን ብቻ ነው፡፡
ለመደርደሪያነት የዚህን ያኸል ከተባለ ወደ ዋናው ጉዳይ አስፈቅደን ሳይሆን ፈቅደን እንገባለን፡፡ ያነሳነው አሳብ ‹‹ መረጃ ›› እንደመሆኑ መጠን ያለማንም ጣልቃ ገብነት ተፍጥሯዊ መብታችን በፈለግነውና በፈቀድነው መንገድ እንገልፃለን፡፡ እኛ ስል ለመረጃ ነፃነት የቆምነው ሁላችንም ማለቴ ነው፡፡
ሰው በመናገሩ አና በመፃፉ ብቻ ለእስር እና ለስደት የሚዳረግበት አገር በዋነኝነት ከሚጠቀሱት ውስጥ ኢትዮጵያ አንዶ ናት፡፡ ነገር ግን ማንኛውም ሰው ያለማንም ጣልቃ ገብነት የአመለካከት እና ሐሳብን በነፃ የመያዝና በማንኛውም የማሰራጫ ዘዴ በሀገር ውስጥም ሆነ ከሀገር ውጪ የመግለፅ ነፃነት አለው፡፡የሚለው በኢትዮጵያ ህገመንግስቱ አንቀፅ 29 ተፅፎ ይገኛል፡፡ በእርግጥ ይህ መብት ገደብ ሊጣልበት እንደሚችል በህገ መንግስቱ ላይ ተገልፆ የተቀመጠ ሲሆን ገደብ ግን መሠረታዊ የሆነውን መረጃን የመስጠት እና የማግኘት እንዲሁም አስተሳሰብ ላይ ወይም አመለካከት ላይ ውጤት እንደማይኖረው በህገመንግስቱ ተገልፆ ይገኛል፡፡
ይሁን እንጂ አሳብን በነፃ ማሰብና ማንሸራሸር በአገራችን ወቅታዊ ሁኔታ እጅግ አዳጋች ደረጃ ላይ ይገኛል፡፡ አልፎ ተርፎ በአስተሳሰብ ወይም በአመለካከት ላይ ተፅኖ እስከመፍጠር ተደርሶኦል ፡፡ ነገር ግን እንዲህ አይነቱ ሁኔታ ለህግም ሆነ ለሞራል ተቃራኒ እንደመሆኑ መጠን የፈጀውን ፈጅቶ ወደነበረበት መመለሱ የማይቀር ሃቅ ነው፡፡ ነፃ አሳብ የሚንሸራሸርባቸው ነፃ ጋዜጦችና መፅሔቶች ምን ያህል አሉ ? ያሉት ጋዜጦች እና መፅሔቶች እየደረሰባቸው ያለው ማስፈራሪያና ዛቻ ደረጃው ምን ያኸል ደርሶአል የሚለውን መመልከት ተገቢ ነው፡፡ ለዚህም ማሳያ የሚሆነው በቅርቡ በወጣው አዲስ ዘመን ጋዜጣ ላይ አክራሪነትና ፅፈኝነት የሚያበረታቱና የሚያሰራጩ በማለት በአስቸጋሪ ሁኔታ ውስጥ ለህዝቡ ተገቢውን መረጃ እያስተላለፉ ያሉ የእትመት ውጤቶችን ከገቢያ ለማውጣትና ፈርጆ ለመክሰስ እየተደረገ ያለው ዝግጅት ሌላው ማሳያ ነው፡፡ጋዜጠኞችን በማሰቃየት፣በማሰር እና እንዲሰደዱ በማደረግ ኢትዮጵያ በዓለም ላይ በሁለተኝነት ደረጃ ላይ ትገኛለች ፡፡መንግስትን ተችቶ የፃፈና ፁሁፉ የወጣበት ጋዜጣ ወይም መፅሔት ጨምሮ ሁሉም ለእስር የሚዳረግበት ወይም አደገኛ ዛቻና መስጠንቀቂያ የሚሰጥበት ደረጃ ላይ ተደርሷል፡፡
በዲሞክራሳዊ ሥርዓተ ዜጎች የሚኖሩት ግልፅ በሆነ የሃሳብ ልውውጥ ነው፡፡ የትኛውም አይነት ሃሳብ ከማንም ሊመጣ ይችላል ቁም ነገሩ መሆን ያለበት የሚመጣው ሃሳብ የሚመከተው በምንድነው የሚለው ነው፡፡ ለነፃ ንግግር ችግር የተሻለው መንገድ የበለጠ ነፃ ንግግር ነው፤ በመናገር መብት ላይ የሚደረግ ማናቸውም ተፅእኖ ሲውል ሲያድር በእያንዳንዱ ግለሰብ የመናገር መብት ላይ ስጋት ሊያስከትል ይችላል፡፡ለዚህም ነው ወደነበረበት መመለሱ የማይቀር ነው ለማለት የሚያስደፍረው፡፡ምክንያቱ ደግሞ ማንም ሰው በስጋት ውስጥ መኖርን ስለማይፈልግ ነው፡፡
በመሆኑም በአገራችን እየከሰመ ያለው ሃሳብን በነፃ የመግልፅ እና መረጃ የማግኘት መብት በገዥው መንግስት መልካም ፍቃድ ላይ የተመሠረት ወደመሆን ደረጃ ተሸጋግሯል፡፡ለዚህም እንደማሳያ ከሰሞኑ የህዝብ ሳይሆን የገዥው መንግስት አንደበት በሆነው በኢቲቪ በተላለፈው የዘጋቢ ፊልም ግለሰቦችም ሆነ በአገር ውስጥ ያሉ የተቃዋሚ ፓርቲዎች በተለይ ሰማያዊ እና አንድነት ፓርቲ ለኢሳት መረጃ ከመስጠት እንዲቆጠቡ ምክር መሰል ማስጠንቀቂያ ተላልፏል፡፡
ለዚህም እንደምክንያት የቀረበው ኢሳት የተባለው የመገናኛ ብዙሃን በሽብርተኛ ድርጅት የሚደገፍ ነው የሚል ምክንያት ነው፡፡ ኢቲቪ በኢህአዴግ እንደሚደገፍ ሁሉ ኢሳት በማንም ሊደገፍ ይችላል፤ ቁም ነገር ሆኖ መታየት ያለበት ኢቲቪ ሆነም ኢሳት የሚያስተላልፉት መልዕክት ምንድነው ፡፡ በተጨማሪ መልዕክቱ ለህግም ሆነ ለሞራል ምን ያኸል ተቃራኒ ነው የሚለውን ነው፡፡ በተጨማሪ ኢቲቪ እንዲሁም ኢሳት በህግ መደመጥ እንዲሁም መሰማት የተከለከሉ የመገናኛ ብዙሃን ናቸው ወይ ተብሎ መጠየቅና መልስ ሊሰጥባቸው የሚገባ አሳቦች ናቸው፡፡ ይሁን እንጂ ወደ መልሱ ስናመራ ኢቲቪ እንዲሁም ኢሳት በህግ የተከለኩ አይደሉም ዋንኛው እና አስፈላጊው ነገር ይሄ ነው ሌላው የህጉ ደጋፊ ሃሳብ ነው፡፡
በመሆኑም ከዚህ በኋላ የህግ ጉዳይ ሳይሆን የፍላጎት ምርጫ ነው የሚሆነው፡፡ የፈለጉትን መስማት እና ማዳመጥ እንዲሁም በፈለጉት የመገናኛ ብዙሃን መንገድ ሃሳብን መግለፅ እና መረጃን ማግኘት ግለሰብ ከሆነ እንደግለሰቡ፣ ተቋም እንደተቋም እንዲሁም ፓርቲ እንደ ፓርቲ የመምረጥ የራስ መብት ነው፡፡ ይህ ደግሞ አንዱ የዲሞክራሲ መገለጫ ነው፡፡ በዚህም መሠረት ከኢቲቪ ኢሳት ከአዲስ ዘመን አዲስ አድማስ የዝወትር ፍላጎታቸው ለሆነ እንዲሁም በተመሳሳይ ከኢሳት ኢቲቪ ከአዲስ አድማስ አዲስ ዘመን ለመረጡ ምርጫቸውን ማክበረ ነው፡፡
ሌላው እና አሳሳቢ ሊሆን የሚገባው ሰው የመረጠውን መስማትና ማዳመጥ እንዲሁም ማንበብ መብቱ እንደጠጠበቀ ሆኖ ግለሰበ ወይም ተቋም ሃሳቡን እንዴት የመግለፅ መብት እና ግዴታ አለበት የሚለው ነው፡፡ ይህን በተመለከተ ተቋም ወይም ግለሰብ ሃሳብን ወይም መረጃን በማንኛውም መንገድ የመገልፅ ሙሉ መበት በህግ የተጠበቀ ነው ፡፡እንዲኹም የዚህ መብት ተቃራኒ የሆኑ ማናቸውም ነገሮች ተቀባይነት እንደሌላቸው በህገመንግስቱ ተደንግጎ ይገኛል፡፡ በዚህም መሰረት በኢሳት ሆነ በማናቸውም የመገናኛ ብዙሃን ሃሳብን መግለፅ እና መረጃን መስጠጥ በራሱ ወንጀል ወይም ጥፋት አይደለም ይህ የሆነው ደግሞ መብት ከመሆኑ አንፃር ነው፡፡
ከዚህ ጋር ተያይዞ መታየት ያለበት ሃሳብን በመግለፅ እና መረጃን በመስጠት ዙሪያ ግዴታ ሊያመጣ የሚችለው ምንድነው የሚለው ነው፡፡ ግለሰቡ ወይንም ተቋሙ በግልፅ በህግ የተከለከለ መረጃ ወይም ሃሳብ የገለፀ እንደሆነ ግዴታው ተጠያቂነትን ስለሚያመጣ በህጉ መሠረት ተጠያቂ ይሆናል፡፡ ይህ የህግ ተጠያቂነት አዱላዊነት የሌለበት ለሁሉም በሁሉም ቦታ እኩል የሚሰራ ነው፡፡ ይህም ማለት በህግ የሚያስጠይቅ ንግግር በኢሳትም ሆነ በኢቲቪ እንዲሁም በቢቢሲ ያደረግ በህግ ከመጠየቅ ንግግር ያደረገበት የብዙሃን መገኛኛ ሊታደገው አይችልም እንደማለት ነው፡፡
በመሆኑም በኢሳት ሃሳብን መግለፅ እንዲሁም መረጃ መስጠት አልፈልግም ማለት መብት ነው፡፡ ነገር ግን በኢሳት አሳባችሁን አትግለፁ መረጃም አትስጡ ማለት ከፍላጎት የመነጨ ሃሳብ ብቻ ሳይሆን የለየለት የእብሪት ተግባር ነው፡፡ እንዲህ አይነቱ አሰፋሪ ምኞት እና ተግባር የሕግና የዲሞክራሲያዊ መብት ካለማወቅ የሚመነጭ አስተሳሰብ ብቻ ሳይሆን ተምሮ ያለመለወጥ ልክፍትም ጭምር ነው! በተለይ በመንግስት ደረጃ ሲታሰብ እጅግ በጣም ያሳፍራል፡፡

የህዝባዊ አንድነትና ሀይል የወያኔ ህወኃት ማጥፊያ


ከሮባ ጳዉሎስ
ROBA PAWLOS CONTENT WRITER
ሮባ ጳዉሎስ
ካለመታደል  ሀገራችን ዛሬም ሰላም ፍትህና ዲሞክራሲ የሰፈነባት በልማትና በእድገት ጎዳና የምትራመድ ሀገር አልሆነችም። ለዚህም በርካታ ምክንያቶች ቢኖሩም እንደ ዓቢይ ምክንያት ተደርጎ የሚቀርበው የህዝብን ይሁንታን ያገኘ፡ ህዝብን በእኩልነት የሚዳኝ፡ ህዝባዊና ዲሞክራሲያዊ የሆነ መንግሥት አለመመስረቱ፡ አገርና ህዝብ የሚተዳደሩበት ዲሞክራሲያዊ ህገ መንግሥት አለመኖሩ ነው። እስከዛሬ በተጨባጭ እንደታየው በ ኢትዮጵያ ሕዝብ ጫንቃ ላይ የተፈራረቁበት ገዥዎቹ በየበኩላቸው አንዱ ከሌላው የሚለዩባቸው ባህርያት ቢኖራቸውም ሁሉንም ግን አንድ የሚያስመስሏቸው ባህርያትም አሏቸው። እነሱም ሁሉም በኃይል ሥልጣን መያዛቸው፡ አምባገነንነታቸው፡ የከፋፍለህ ግዛ ፖሊሲ ማራመዳቸው፡ በህዝብ መካከል የጋራ መተማመንና ከበሬታን ለመፍጠር፡ ሁሉም ዘላቂ ሰላምና መረጋጋትን በሀገሪቱ ለማስፈን አለመቻላቸው ደግሞ ዛሬ ለሁሉም በግልጥ እየታየ ያለ ነው። በዚህም የተነሳ በሀገራችን ለብሔራዊ ክብርና ነፃነት፡ ለዲሞክራሲ፡ ለማህበራዊ ፍትህ፡ ለሰላምና ለእኩልነት የሚታገሉ ኃይሎች የሰላማዊ ለውጥ በሮች ስለተዘጉባቸው የአ መፅን ጎዳና እንዲከተሉ የሚጋብዝ በር ተቀዶ ይገኛል።
በሌላ በኩል ደግሞ በሀገሪቱ ውስጥ የፖለቲካ መረጋጋት ንእዲፈጠር፡ ሕዝቡም አስተማማኝ ሰላምና ፀጥታ አግኝቶ ያለስጋት ለመኖር እንዲችል፡ የዳኝነት ተቋሞች ነፃ ሆነው የሚሠሩበት፡ የህግ የበላይነት የተረጋገጠበት ሁኔታ እንዲፈጠርና፡ ህዝቡም በህግና ሥርዓት መኖር ላይ እምነት እንዲያድርበት ለማድረግ እንዲቻል፡ ለዲሞክራሲያዊ ሥርዓት የሚታገሉ ኢትዮጵያዊ ተቃዋሚ ኃይሎች በተናጠልም ሆነ በኅብረት በርካታ ጥረቶች ተደርገዋል። ሆኖም እስከዛሬ የተደረጉት ጥረቶችን ሁሉ በማምከን ወያኔ የሰላምና የእርቅ መሰናከል ከመሆኑም ባሻገር በንፁሃን ዜጎች ደም ሰላምን አጠልሽቶታል። ወያኔ ስለ ሰላምና እርቅ ሊሰማም ሊነጋገርም እማይችልበት የደም ስካር ላይ ደርሷል።
ብአዴን ቢመጣ ኦህዴድ ቢመጣ ደህዴን ቢመጣ የሚለወጥ ነገር አይኖርም። ጠንከር ያለ ለለውጥ የተዘጋጀ – አስከ ሞት የቆረጠ -ጠቅላይ ሚኒስተር ስልጣን አገኘ ማለት የህወሃት የበላይነት እና ፈላጭ ቆራጭነት ፍላጎት ፈተና ይገጥመዋል ማለት ስለሆነ! ህወህት የበላይነቱን ለማሰጠበቅ የፈጠራቸው የመንግስት ስልጣን አደረጃጀት አና ተቋማት ዛሬም በሙሉ ሃይላቸው አሉ።  የህወሃት ፈላጭ ቆራጭነት ሳይዳከም ለውጥ አይመጣም። የህወሃት ፈላጭ ቆራጭነት መሰረቱ ደሞ ከምንም በላይ ወታደራዊ ሃይሉ ላይ የተመሰረተ አንደሆነ የአደባባይ ሚስጥር ነው። በደህነንት ቢሮ ያሉትን የህወሃት አመራሮች ከታች ያሉት ማዳክም የሚችሉበትን አጋጣሚ አና ሁኔታ ተጠቅመው አስካላዳከሙት ደረስ የህወሃት የስልጣን የበላይነት ትርጉም ባለው ሁኔታ እክል ሊገጥመው አይችልም።
ሌላ ሌላውን ትተን መሰረታዊ የሆነ ህገ-መንግስታዊ ማሻሻያ ያስፈልጋል፣ የፍትህ ስርዕቱ የፍትህ ስርእት መመስልም መሆንም አለበት፣ የነጻው ፕሬስና ሃሳብን በነጻነት የመግለጽ መብት ህዳሴ አንመራለን አየተባለ በመካከለኛው ዘመን አና ከዛ በፊት ከነበረው አንደነበረው በሰይፍ አና በሰደፍ መያዝ የለበትም። አነኚህ ወሳኝ ርምጃዎች በአዝጋሚ ለውጥ ይመጣሉ ብየ አላስብም። የአዝጋሚ ለውጥ ዲስኩር (ፍላጎት ካለ ፍላጎትም) ጭራሽ ወደማይቀልበስ የባርነት ዓለም አና ዘመን የመውሰጃ ከፓለቲካ ዘዴ ሊሆን ይችላል።  ጋዜጠኞችና የተቃዋሚ ፓለቲካ መሪዎች ዘብጥያ ሲጣሉ ሙስሊም ኢትዮጵያውያን የፈጠሩትን ዓይነት ጫና መፍጠር ስላልተቻለ አንኳን መሰረታዊ የፕሬስ ነጻነት አና በነጻነት ያለገደብ የመደራጀት መብት የሚከበርበት ፍንጭ ሊገኝ ቀርቶ የታሰሩትን ጋዜጠኞች አና የፓለቲካ መሪዎች ማስፈታት አንኳን አልተቻለም። ጭራሽ መብታቸው ተረግጦ ያላግባብ አስር ቤት የተጣሉ ኢትዮጵያውያን ዛሬ ድረስ “አሸባሪ” አየተባሉ አየተፌዘባቸው ነው ያለው። አቶ ኃይለማርያምም ፌዙን በጠቅላይ ሚኒስትርነት ማዕረግ አያስተጋቡት ነው።
ከበቀለበት የተጋጋበት አንዲሉ የ”በሳሉ መሪ ራዕይ” ዜማ ከህወሃት አባላት በእህት ድርጂቶች የፓለቲካ አላዋቂዎች አና መሪዎች ይበልጥ ተዜመ! በአቶ ኃይለማርያም ደሳለኝም ተሰማ። ችግሩ የለውጥ ጥያቄ ማድበስበሻ ሆኖ ለረዢም ጊዜ ሊቆይ አይችልም። በውሽት ላይ የተመሰረተ ፐሮፓጋንዳ ስር ሊይዝ አይችልም።አንዴት ይሄን ማየት አቃታቸው?!የሕዝባችን መከራና ሰቆቃ እየከፋ ሄደ።  የተጨቆነዉ ሕዝብ ተነሳስቶ ለመብቱ ሲታገል ጨቋኝ መንግሥታት ለዉጥ እንዲያደርጉ ይገደዳሉ፤ ካለዚያ በተባበረዉ የሕዝብ ኃይል ተንኮታኩተዉ ይወድቃሉ። የታገለዉ ለዉጥ ያመጣል፤ ያልታገለዉ ቁጭ ብሎ በባርነት ሲገዛ ይኖራል፤ ቁጭም ባለበት ይሞታል ማለት ነው። የለዉጥ ባለቤት ሁሌ ሕዝብ መሆን አለበት። ህዝቡ ትግሉን በሚገባ እንዲያቀናጅ የትግል መሪ ይፈልጋል። ስለዚህ የተቃዋሚ የፖሊቲካ መሪዎች ታላቅ ኃላፊነት ይጠበቅባቸዋል። ያገራችንን ጭብጥ ሁኔታ ስንመረምር ግን በሁለቱም በኩል ታላላቅና ተደጋጋሚ ድክመቶች ታይተዋል። አምባገነን መንግሥታት ለዘለዓለም ካልገዛን ሲሉ የተቃዋሚ ድርጅቶች ኅብረታቸዉን ማጠናከር ስላልቻሉ የጨቋኝ መንግሥታትን ዘመናት ሲያራዝሙ ቆይተዋል።ወያኔ/ኢሕአደግ ለዘለዓለም ሊገዛ አይችልም፤ ለሁሉም ጊዜ አለዉና።ትግሉ ይበልጥ መፋፋም፡ ይበልጥ መጨስ፡ መጋጋም፡ መንደድ ይጠበቅበታል። ትግሉን ለማፈንና አቅጣጫውን ለማሳት የወያኔ መንጋ እየተሯሯጠ ነው። በውጭ ያለውንም የሕዝብና የድርጅቶችን ተቃውሞ ቢቻለው ለማዳፈን፡ ካልሆነለት ደግሞ ለማዳከም፡ በአሁኑ ወቅት የወያኔ ከፋፋይ ቡድን በየቦታው በመንቀሳቀስ ላይ እንደሚገኝ እያየን ነው። ይህ ቡድንም፡ ምሁር ነን፡ አስታራቂ ነን፡ ሽማግሌ ነን ወይም ታጋይ ነን በሚሉ መሰሪዎችም እየተደገፈ ነው። የሕዝብ ክንድ ይላላ፡ ይደክም ዘንድ፡ በከፋፋይ ሴራ የተሰማሩትን ነቅቶ መጠበቅ፡ ትግሉን መከላከል ብቻ ሳይሆን ወያኔ ለባሾችን፡ ሰላዮችን ሳንፈራ እየመነጠርን ማጋለጥ ይኖርብናል። ዘረኛው ቡድንና ጭፍሮቹ የሕዝቡን ትግል ለመከፋፈል ከመቼውም ጊዜ በበለጠ እየጣሩ ናቸውና። ሕዝብ አንድነቱን ጠብቆ፡  የወያኔን ቡድን ለአንዴም ለሁሌም ለማስወገድ አስፈላጊውን መስዋእ ትነት እየከፈለ ባለበት ወቅት የፖለቲካ ድርጅቶችን እገዛና አመራር ይጠይቃል። የሕዝብ አሸናፊነት አጠራጣሪ ባይሆንም፡ አሸናፊ ለመሆን ግን መታገል መቅደም እንዳለበት ምን ጊዜም መረሳት የለበትም። ለዚህ መሠረቱ ግን ከራስ ጋር እየታረቁ፡ ከወገን ጋር እየተስማሙ በጋራ ዓላማና ብሔራዊ እጅንዳ ዙሪያ ተሰባስቦ በጋራ መታገል ብቻ ነው። በዓለም ታላቅ ዝና ያተረፉት የግ/ቀ/ኃ/ሥና በአፍሪቃ አህጉር መሬትን ያንቀጠቀጠዉ የደርግ መንግሥት ቀናቸዉ ሲደርስ እንዴት እንደመነመኑና እንደከሰሙ መዘርዘር አይኖርብኝም፤ በታሪክ ፊት ተቀምጧልና። በሩቁም በእነ አሜሪካ ለረዥም ዓመታት ሲረዱና ሲደገፉ በነበሩት በእነ ሞቡቱ፤ የሻህ ንጉሥ፤ ሆስኒ ሙባረክ፤ ወዘተ ላይ በመጨረሻ የደረሰዉን ዉርደት መገንዘብ ያስፈልጋል። ተቃዋሚ የፖሊቲካ ድርጅቶች ነን የሚሉትና በተግባር ግን የጭቆናን ዘመን የሚያራዝሙ በሙሉ ካለፉት ስህተቶች ገና ሊማሩ አልቻሉም፤ ・ድር ቢያብር እንበሳ ያስር・ የተባለዉን ቅዱስ አሳብ ደጋግመዉ መናቃቸዉ ያስተዛዝባል። ቁርጥ ያለ አቋም ያስፈልጋል፤ ከዛፍ ዛፍ መዝለል ዬትም አያደርስም። ለጊዜያዊ ጥቅማ ጥቅሞች በርካሽ መገዛትና አገርን መሸጥ በሰማይም በምድርም ያስጠይቃል። ቀኑ ሲደርስ ራቆታችንን ወደምድር እነደመጣን ሁሉ ራቆታችንን ወደዚያዉ እነደምንመለስ አንርሳ!!!
ነገርግን በህብረት ለሀገር ታሪክ ሰርቶ ማለፍ ዘላለማዊ የትዉልድና የሀገር ክብር ነዉ!!!

Demonizing Ethiopian History


by Alemayehu G. Mariam*
demonization and vilification campaign against Atse Menelik II
Atse Menelik II

The regime in power in Ethiopia today is orchestrating a full-court press demonization and vilification campaign against Atse Menelik II, the Nineteenth Century Ethiopian emperor whose centennial is being celebrated this year (Ethiopian calendar). The campaign is conducted largely through regime lackey-proxies, stooges and puppets. Through its minions, the regime has used the most loathsome words, inflammatory rhetoric and repugnant imagery to describe Menelik’s alleged brutality in his quest for territorial conquest. The regime’s servile drones have been all over social media parroting historical lies, distortions, fabrications, disinformation and falsehoods. The agitators have tried to whip up a propaganda frenzy in an attempt to caricature, demean and demonize the great Ethiopian leader. One hundred years after his death, they have tried to resurrect him as the devil incarnate. Barely two years after Meles Zenawi’s death they want to resurrect him as the savior of Ethiopia.
One need not be surprised by the volume or vehemence of the propaganda attack on Atse Menelik or the regime’s methodical and organized campaign to incite hatred and ill-will by trotting out Menelik’s Ghost. The fact of the matter is that the real issue is not about the demonization (making a devil) of Menelik but about the canonization (making a saint) of the regime’s late capo di tutti capi (boss of all bosses) Meles Zenawi.
Demons Demonizing Atse Menelik II
The vehement demonization propaganda campaign being waged against Atse Menelik II is a futile attempt to re-write, miswrite, overwrite and un-write Ethiopian history with the hagiography (tale of sainthood) of Meles Zenawi. They want to unwrite Menelik’s history and write up Meles’ history as the greatest African leader of modern times. They want to mythologize Meles, the “new breed of African leader”; Meles the bringer of developmental state democracy; Meles, the African leader on Global Warming and Climate change; Meles, the African leader who rubs elbows with leaders of the G-8 and the G-20; Meles, the chairperson of the Beijing Summit of the Forum on China-Africa Cooperation; Meles, the destroyer of Somali jihadists and terrorists… By demonizing Menelik, they want to canonize (make a saint) Meles. Why demonize Menelik? Because he created a modern African nation from petty feuding fiefdoms, kingdoms, princedoms and chiefdoms. He is demonized because he stood up and whipped on the battlefield one of the great European imperialist powers and permanently secured Ethiopian independence and sovereignty. He is demonized because he was a true African leader. By defaming Menelik and degrading his legacy, they seek to give fame to Meles and sanctify his legacy.
The regime wants to completely overwrite the history of Atse Menelik. Menelik was the first African leader to build a railroad. They want to overwrite that history by claiming Meles was the first to bring a  magnificent long distance and light rail system to Ethiopia. Menelik was the first African leader to introduce the telephone and telegraph on the continent. When the first telephone was installed in Menelik’s palace in 1889 thirteen years after Alexander Graham Bell patented his “apparatus for vocal sounds”, anxious clergymen asked him to remove it as the work of Satan, which he declined. Within a decade, Menelik had inaugurated a telephone line connecting the capital with the eastern city of Harar. They want overwrite that history by claiming that Meles brought the most modern communication system to Ethiopia. The truth of the matter is that the first African country to have telephone and telegraph service today has the worst mobile telephone and internet service in Africa. Last week, The Wall Street Journal reported that while farmers in Ethiopia have cell (mobile) phones, “The trouble is, they have to walk several miles to get a good signal.” Ethiopia has the second worst internet service in Africa.
They want to miswrite history by depicting Menelik as brutal king who lopped off women’s breasts. When it comes to brutality, is there anyone more brutal and cold-blooded than Meles Zenawi? Meles personally ordered the massacre of hundreds of unarmed protesters in 2005. Meles’s own hand-picked and appointed Inquiry Commission reported that police and security officials under Meles’ direct personal command and control intentionally and deliberately massacred 193 unarmed protesters and severely wounded 763 others. Meles personally ordered the massacre of over 400 hundred civilians in Gambella, in western Ethiopia in 2004.  Meles personally authorized the bombing and strafing of villages in the Ogaden. Under Meles’ personal command, his troops in the Ogaden committed gang rapes, burned villages, conducted “demonstration killings” including public hangings and beheadings intended to terrorize the population.  Steve Crawshaw, the United Nations advocacy director for Human Rights Watch described the crimes against humanity committed in the Ogaden as “a mini-Darfur.”
They want to rewrite history by depicting Menelik as an enemy of the Oromo people. There is more than sufficient evidence to prosecute Meles, if he were alive, and members of his gang for the untold and unspeakable crimes against humanity they committed against the Oromo people. The international human rights organization Freedom House in 2012 reported that Meles and his regime engaged in widespread discrimination and repression against Oromo people.  Meles has banned the Oromo Liberation Front and jailed untold numbers of suspected members and leaders without due process of law.  According to former Ethiopian President Negasso Gidada, when he left office in 2001 “roughly 25,000 people were in prison on OLF-related charges throughout Oromia and in Addis Ababa.” Meles’ former comrade and defense minister Seeye Abraha ironically observed: “Kaliti Prison speaks Oromiffa, and 99% of one of the camps housing hundreds of inmates at Kality Prison are Oromo. Many of the detainees don’t know their charges but have counted years as OLF suspects.”
Meles invaded Somalia in 2006 on the bogus pretext that jihadist were taking over that country and that he had been “invited” by the Somalis to intervene.  In a televised address Meles said, “Ethiopian defense forces were forced to enter into war to protect the sovereignty of the nation and to blunt repeated attacks by Islamic courts terrorists and anti-Ethiopian elements they are supporting.” On December 27, 2006, Meles’ troops and tanks stormed into Mogadishu. By August 2007, Meles’ troops were bogged down in Somalia and the human cost was proving to be horrendous: Tens of thousands of Somali civilians had died and over 870,000 were forced to flee their homes in Mogadishu, a bustling city of 1.2 million people in 2006. After Meles’ invasion, international human rights organizations described Somalia “as one of the worst humanitarian situations in Africa.”
Menelik fought defensive wars against Europe’s imperialist aggressors and won. It is undeniable that Menelik was the first African leader in history to decisively defeat a mighty European power in battle and send them packing back to Europe with their tails between their legs. Menelik whipped the Italians at Amba Alagi and Mekele and delivered the final blow at the Battle of Adwa in 1896. No European could have imagined that an army of “black African savages” could defeat a mighty European imperial power. Menelik was a brilliant military tactician and despite his extreme disadvantages in modern weaponry, tactics and resources, he prevailed triumphantly crushing once and for all the ideology of white superiority and supremacy. Through trickery and deception, various European imperial powers sought to carve out pieces of Ethiopia as colonial territories. In 1889, Menelik concluded the Treaty of Uccialli with Italy with respect to certain territories in the north of the country.  When he found out that the Italian language version of the treaty, in stark contrast to the Amharic version, had rendered Ethiopia an Italian protectorate, he denounced the agreement.
They want to rewrite this history by showcasing Meles as the regional and international leader who made Ethiopia a regional power. They want to portray him as the man who defended Ethiopian territorial integrity and sovereignty. The facts show otherwise. Meles fought the Eritreans in 1998-99 over a border dispute in Badme, secured a military victory at the cost of 80,000 Ethiopian lives and promptly agreed to turn over Badme to the Eritreans in international arbitration. Never in the history of warfare has a victorious army turned over its victory to the vanquished so willingly. After defeating the socialist military junta in 1991, during transitional negotiations moderated by the U.S., Meles refused to accept the port of Assab on the Eritrean coast as Ethiopia’s outlet to the sea. Meles is singularly responsible for making Ethiopia a landlocked country. Through secret treaties Meles has given away Ethiopian territory to the Sudanese without so much as perfunctorily consulting his rubber stamp parliament. Meles has pawned off millions of hectares of the most fertile land in the country to underhanded fly-by-night operators.
Menelik united Ethiopia and inaugurated the modern Ethiopian state.  Meles brought the illusion of modernization. He built hospitals without doctors or medicine. He once said we don’t need doctors. He built universities without competent professors, books, libraries or modern technology. He built buildings without sewers. Menelik opened Ethiopia to Western civilization. Meles took Ethiopia back to Oriental despotism with his ludicrous theory of the “developmental state”. After taking power in 1991, Meles fragmented the modern Ethiopian state and promptly proceeded to balkanize the country into so-called kilils, or apartheid-style bantustans or kililistans. Despite Meles’ completely bogus claims of double-digit economic growth and exhortations of of Ethiopia as the “fastest for a non-oil exporting country in Sub-Saharan Africa”, Ethiopia atually became the second poorest country in the world as I documented in my commentary, “Why is Ethiopia Poor?
Menelik was a “renaissance” Ethiopian leader.  He took important steps to strengthen and modernize his country. He eagerly embraced modern technology and brought new communication systems to the country. Menelik introduced the telephone and telegraph and a modern postal system. He introduced electricity to Addis Ababa. He imported the first motor car and even tried to introduce a modern Ethiopian currency replacing the Maria Theresa thaler, the silver bullion coin that had been used in world trade at the time. Menelik always placed Ethiopian sovereignty above all else. In 1894, Menelik gave the French a concession to lay rail lines from Djibouti to Addis Ababa. The same year, the European imperial powers held the Berlin Conference and carved up Africa for European colonialism. When the French tried to pull a fast one to divest Ethiopian sovereignty over the rail line, Menelik shut them down cold and relented only after reasserting Ethiopian sovereignty in 1906. They want to rewrite that history by writing a bogus narrative of Meles, the Renaissance Leader, the Builder of Hydroelectric Dams Unseen in African History, the Builder of Bridges, Roads and Railroads…   
Menelik may have presided over a feudal kingdom. He is an African leader who did what he could under extreme domestic and international conditions. He left a legacy of an Ethiopia, one nation under God, under Allah. Meles’ enduring legacy is that he created the first true thugtatorship in Africa. As I explained in my Huffington Post commentary, “If democracy is government of the people, by the people and for the people, a thugocracy is a government of thieves, for thieves, by thieves. Simply stated, a thugtatorship is rule by a gang of thieves and robbers (thugs) in designer suits. In a thugtatorship, the purpose of seizing and clinging to political power is solely to accumulate personal wealth for the ruling class by stealing public funds and depriving the broader population scarce resources necessary for basic survival.”
The fact of Meles’ thugtatorship is amply documented not only in the records but also in the eyewitness  testimony of his former comrades-in-arms. From the inception in the bush, Meles and his comrades set up a kleptocratic system of administration. They diverted tens of millions of dollars earmarked for famine relief in Tigrai region in the early 1980s to buy weapons and enrich themselves. Recent reports have shown that over one-half of the Ethiopian economy is controlled by Meles’ officials, supporters, cronies, friends, comrades and others. Corruption and theft of state resources is so endemic in Ethiopia that the World Bank singled out Ethiopia as a case study of corruption in its nearly 500-page report entitled, “Diagnosing Corruption in Ethiopia”. Thugtatorship shall be the lasting legacy of Meles. 
They just love to hate Menelik
Hate is a symptom of a terminal sickness of the soul. Hate is irrational. The scientific literature on hate shows that haters hate because they are afraid, insecure, jealous; or because they hate themselves; or because they  want to become the very object of their hate. Above all, haters hate themselves because they feel inadequate, powerless, hopeless and helpless. 
Mandela said, “No one is born hating another person because of the color of his skin, or his background, or his religion. People must learn to hate.” When I think of those in power in Ethiopia today, I wonder and ponder if Mandela is right in his philosophical assessment. He added, “If they can learn to hate, they can be taught to love, for love comes more naturally to the human heart than its opposite.” I really want to believe that Mandela’s principle would apply to those in power despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary.
As a matter of principle and practice, we must strive to live by Gandhi’s rule: “Hate the sin and not the sinner.” When we hate the haters, we become their mirror images. We are who we hate. If we hate Meles or his gang as a human beings, we become them. If we must hate, it must be their acts and not them as human beings.
Hate is a powerful force. The hate spread by the Nazis destroyed entire nations. Hate in Rwanda destroyed the lives of millions of Rwandans. In Darfur, hate destroyed the lives of millions of Sudanese. Thousands continue to die in Nigeria and the Central African Republic because of religious hatred today. We must never, never give into hate.
I believe there are two types of people in the world. There are those who follow the golden rule “love thy neighbor as thyself.” There are others who live by what I call the “copper rule”, “hate thy neighbor as thyself.” Haters think they can overcome their own helplessness, insecurity, guilt and inability to change their circumstances by hating. They hope to raise their feelings of inferiority and low self-worth by hating others. Those who hate Menelik do not really hate Menelik; they hate themselves and wish they could be Menelik and whatever he symbolizes.
I pity those in power in Ethiopia today. I really do. I feel sorry for them. They think they can sanctify their late leader and their two-decade history by demonizing great Ethiopian leaders and tearing down Ethiopian history. They think by tearing down Menelik and Haile Selassie they can build up Meles. They think that by removing Menelik’s statutes from public places and plastering cheap posters of Meles at every street corner they can elevate Meles to the status of a deity. Meles fought tooth and nail to make sure H.I.M. Haile Selassie’s statute would not sit next to Nkrumah’s on the grounds of the African Union in Ethiopia. Yet Nkruma himself said there would have been no Organization of African Unity but for the relentless efforts of H.I.M. Haile Selassie. 
Despite prolonged reflection on the nature of the hate practiced by those in power in Ethiopia today, I find no rational explanation. Most people fear and are apprehensive of the future because it is unknown and unpredictable. I cannot fathom people who fear the past, the distant past, the Nineteenth Century Ethiopia. In my professional experience, I have learned that the only people who fear and dread the past are criminals fearful that the crimes they have committed in the past will eventually catch up with them. I have also come to the conclusion that those in power hate to cover up and conceal their abuses and misuses of power and use hate to divide and rule. They use hate to create fear and loathing among Ethiopians of different ethnic groups so that they will not be the object of scrutiny and accountability. Hate mongering is used to distract people from their economic problems.
Love thy hater as thyself
The golden rule says, “love thy neighbor as thy self.” I say, “love thy hater as thyself.” It is better to love than to hate. Hate is like a boomerang. It goes out and comes around to the hater. To paraphrase Mandela, hate is a poison of the soul. When haters hate, they are drinking poison and expecting those they hate to die. There is also a strange dialectics to hate that those in power should heed. Hate often transforms the hated into an object of love and admiration. Those in power in Ethiopia today should learn from the experiences of their apartheid soul mates in the old South Africa. The apartheid masters sought to diminish Mandela’s humanity, leadership and reputation for decades. They put out all sorts of propaganda about him as a terrorist and communist and never released a single photo of him during his years of captivity. However, the law of unintended consequences prevailed. As time passed and the anti-apartheid movement grew, Mandela’s invisibility only added to his mythic status and helped transform him into an international icon. The lesson is that the more they try to demonize Menelik and Haile Selassie, the more Menelik and Haile Selassie will be popular in the imagination of the younger generation. The more the older generation will reassess its views about these leaders as they become the objects of unending and relentless campaigns of vilification.
We must go beyond hate to love. Dr. Martin Luther King and Mandela have taught us about the unconquerable power of love (agape) of humanity and community; the power of healing a society afflicted by the cancer of racial, ethnic and religious hate. Mandela had every reason to hate and exact revenge. For 27 years Mandela’s name was Prisoner no. 46664.  When he emerged from the prison gates that February morning in 1990, he beamed with that million dollar smile of his. He did not have a single hateful thing to say about the masters of apartheid who jailed him for 27 years and separated him from his family. He taught us a great lesson: “As I walked out the door toward the gate that would lead to my freedom, I knew if I didn’t leave my bitterness and hatred behind, I’d still be in prison.” Mandela was never a prisoner of hate. The prison was apartheid hate itself and the inmates were the wardens and masters of apartheid. Mandela left prison to liberate the real inmates of apartheid chained behind their walls of hate, fear and revenge. 
If those in power in Ethiopia today continue with their hate, they will find themselves in much the same situation as those who were in power in apartheid South Africa. The “free” whites during apartheid stayed up all night thinking about what the black Africans they had repressed for so long could do to them when inevitable majority rule comes. The hatred they had for black Africans not only denied them sleepless nights but also destroyed their heart, minds and souls, their humanity. They became zombies; the walking dead unable to enjoy the comforts of their wealth; their exclusive neighborhoods became virtual prisons gated and surrounded by electric fencing and prison-style razor wires. They live in virtual armed camps.
There is a better way. Rather than responding with more hateful vitriol, we should be more determined to find out the truth. We should bring out the truth about Atse Menelik II, Atse Haile Selassie, Colonel/President Mengistu Hailemariam and Prime Minster Meles Zenawi. Let us learn from their mistakes not to hate them but to make sure we the living do not repeat their mistkes. Let us learn from their errors not to engage in recrimination but to find ways of reconciliation and to correct their mistakes. We should band together with Ethiopia’s young people to build the New Beloved Ethiopia where no man or woman has to identify him/herself by his/her ethnicity but his/her humanity, Africanity and Ethiopianity. Let us build a New Beloved Ethiopia where no man or woman feels so secure in his/her powers that s/he can order the massacre of unarmed citizens and innocent civilians and get away with it. We must work together to create a society that respects the dignity and rights of every individual regardless of his/her ethnicity, faith or language. That is how we must build a future, not by tearing down a past that has long faded into the fog of time.
Let us not get offended or angry by the rhetoric of hate. It serves no useful purpose. Let us expose the demonization campaign, debunk the myths, and defend against the demonization and molestation of Ethiopian history. Let’s us not throw ourselves in the mud and muck with the haters. We should never forget George Bernard Shaw’s admonition, “I learned long ago, never to wrestle with a pig. You get dirty, and besides, the pig likes it.” Exchanging hateful words with professional, and possibly born haters, haters is like wrestling with pigs in the mud.
Changing hate to love
Let the haters hate and lie. There is not much we can do about that. What is within our power is the ability to  change ourselves from hating to loving; we have the capacity to transform  negative energy into positive energy. We should change from hating to loving not because it is easy but because it is exceedingly difficult. Love, whether of self, others, community or nation requires a lot of work.
Let us learn from Gandhi and his way of Satyagraha or “truth force”.  Gandhi explained, “Truth (satya) implies love, and firmness (agraha) engenders and therefore serves as a synonym for force.” The aim is to convert the hater not to coerce him or her. In practical terms, the aim is to convince the hater that the hate in his/her heart, mind and soul will destroy him/her; that his/her only salvation is love of self, community and nation. Let us use Satyagraha to make lovers out of haters.
We should learn from Dr. King: “Darkness cannot drive out darkness: only light can do that. Hate cannot drive out hate: only love can do that.” He taught that “we must develop and maintain the capacity to forgive. He who is devoid of the power to forgive is devoid of the power to love. There is some good in the worst of us and some evil in the best of us. When we discover this, we are less prone to hate our enemies.” Forgiveness and reconciliation are the antidotes, the cure, for hate.
We should even learn from the greatest comic of modern times, Charlie Chaplin: “The hate of men will pass, and dictators die, and the power they took from the people will return to the people. And so long as men die, liberty will never perish.” Liberty will outlive all haters.  Let us close ranks regardless of ethnicity and reaffirm our basic humanity in our Ethiopianity and Africanity. Let’s leave no room for haters; we should crowd them out.
Message to those in power in Ethiopia today
My message to the hate mongers in power in Ethiopia is simple. The hate you propagate today will boomerang back to you. Today you smile and snicker at the statute dedicated to show Menelik as a breast lopping brute. Those who are told to hate Menelik today will be told to hate Meles tomorrow. The day is not long when your great visionary leader Meles will be commemorated in stone and marble as the Second Coming of Rodolfo Graziani in the Ogaden, Gambella, Addis Ababa and elsewhere. Those you hold as friends today will be your mortal enemies tomorrow. Those you demonize as your enemies today will be your friends tomorrow when the chips are down and you are on the receiving end. That is the dialectics of history.  Learn from history.  
Atse Menelik II was neither saint nor demon; he was neither divine nor a demigod. He was an African king  who tried to unite and modernize Ethiopia when the rest of Africa was on the chopping block of European imperialism being sliced, diced, spiced, spliced, priced and sacrificed. Let Menelik II be judged by only one measure: The Truth. Historians should tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth about Menelik. In his centenary commemoration, I submit the testimony of the Belgian explorer, Baron de Jarlsburg, given to the New York Times in 1909  as part, and only part, of the historical evidence to be used in pronouncing judgment on Atse Menelik II:

Menelik has since accession to the throne, twenty years ago, transformed Abyssinia from a semi-barbarous power to a State modeled on the lines of a European constitutional monarchy… The sovereign, who styles himself somewhat pompously, Conquering Lion of the Tribe of Juda, Elect of the Saviour, King of Kings of Ethiopia, shattered Italy’s colonial ambitions by his victories at Amba-Garima… When Menelik was crowned Emperor of Ethiopia on Nov. 4, 1889, after King Johanne’s death, he was far from being the accepted ruler of all the States which constitute the Abyssinian empire. It was only after much hard fighting that Menelik finally succeeded in subjugating those rebellious chieftains who did not recognize him… Since then, Menelik’s one aim has been to introduce European civilization into his country. The Emperor, after abolishing the feudal laws still extant in the empire, and emancipating the slaves, established compulsory free education throughout his dominions. As a result in another generation education will be as widespread in Abyssinia as in several European countries.
Menelik is himself an altogether unique figure among African potentates. As a diplomat, as a financier, and as a soldier, he can hold his own with the most up-to-date of his brother sovereigns. As a soldier and a diplomat, he showed his worth at the time of Italy’s defeat by the Abyssinians. In late years, however, it is particularly as a financier that Menelik has distinguished himself. He had a natural bent for finance, even as a young man, before his accession to the throne, and at that time went for stock speculation on the Paris Bourse to a considerable extent. These youthful speculations proved successful, and were only interrupted by the events which followed Menelik’s accession… The Abyssinian ruler has extended the range of his financial operations to the United States, and is heavy investor in American railroads. With  his American securities and his French and Belgian mining investments, Menelik has a private fortune estimated at no less than twenty-five million dollars.
The most striking fact about Abyssinia’s dusky ruler is his versatility. An accomplished linguist, he speaks French, English, and Italian fluently. Notwithstanding all the time he is compelled to devote to state affairs, he still finds the opportunity to keep up in current European literature, and is rarely at a loss when a new author is mentioned. At Adissaba Palace – to give him the title by which he is known to his subjects — he takes particular pride in his library of ten thousand volumes, collected by himself. Menelik’s chief hobby in the way of books are works dealing with the ancient civilizations of Africa and Asia.
Offering Menelik haters a square deal
I offer Menelik haters a square deal: If you stop lying about Menelik, I will stop telling the truth about Meles!
Professor Alemayehu G. Mariam teaches political science at California State University, San Bernardino and is a practicing defense lawyer.
Previous commentaries by the author are available at:
Amharic translations of recent commentaries by the author may be found at:

28 Ethiopian political and civic organizations sent a protest letter to the UN

The Ethiopian Borders Affairs Committee sent a letter to the United Nations Secretary-General, H.E. Mr. Ban ki-Moon exposing the TPLF/EPRDF secret border deal with the Sudan and rejecting any attempt that violates upon the sovereignty and territorial integrity of Ethiopia. The protest letter has been endorsed by 28 Ethiopian political and civic organizations according to The Ethiopian Borders Affairs Committee.
Ethiopian Border Affairs Committee
P. O. Box 9536 Columbus, Ohio 43209 USA
E-mail: ethiopianborders@gmail.com
H.E Mr. Ban Ki-Moon
United Nations Secretary General
1st Avenue, 46th Street
New York, NY 10017
January 10, 2014
Your Excellency:
We, the undersigned representatives of various Ethiopian political parties, civic organizations and professional associations, have the honor to bring to your attention our strong protest against the secret border deal that the dictatorial governments of Ethiopia and the Sudan have recently been hatching.
The respective territorial limits of both countries were defined by the Anglo-Ethiopian Treaty of 1902 at the turn of the last century when Great Britain was the colonial power administering the Sudan.  As is customary in international practice in delimiting national boundaries, the treaty provided for the setting up of a Joint Boundary Commission to be appointed by both sides to carry out the actual demarcation of the boundary on the ground. Upon completion of the demarcation process both parties were required to notify their citizens of the boundary as demarcated.
Despite the clear mandate of these undertakings, however, the treaty has remained a dead letter for over a century and, as a consequence, the boundary between the two countries has never been demarcated by a joint commission. Instead, contrary to both the spirit and letter of the provisions of the treaty, Great Britain appointed its own officer, Major Charles W. Gwynn, to unilaterally and arbitrarily demarcate the boundary without the knowledge and the participation of Ethiopian boundary commissioners. In the event, the demarcation line which resulted from this high-handed exercise greatly favored the Sudan while causing Ethiopia to suffer a corresponding amount of territorial loss.
Notwithstanding the fact that the demarcation of the boundary by one of the Contracting Parties cannot legally bind the other, nevertheless Sudan has over the years importuned successive Ethiopian administrations to accept the validity of the unilateral demarcation undertaken by the British.  The consistent and unequivocal response of these administrations, however, has been to reject the validity of Sudan’s claims, calling instead for a negotiated settlement of the boundary on the basis of the original treaty with the full knowledge, participation and consent of peoples likely to be affected by the demarcation line.
As Your Excellency well knows, the international political system grants a considerable degree of importance to rights in respect of territory. The function of a boundary between states is the attribution of territory and, thus, the extent of a state’s territorial sovereignty. When the extent and limits of a state’s territorial sovereignty are determined solely and arbitrarily by one state to the detriment of the other, however, the boundary so determined becomes an enduring source of friction and tension between the adjoining states. It is precisely to avoid such a result that international law attributes to an international boundary a compelling degree of continuity and finality. Nevertheless, this venerable principle will be respected and observed in practice only if the given boundary was established in accordance with law. More importantly, a boundary regime can be regarded as final only where either of the states can clearly establish its legal credentials.  In the case of the Ethio-Sudan boundary, this means that the treaty regime set up by the parties – and no other arrangement- was meant to govern the boundary and title to territory.
According to media reports originating in the Sudan, however, under the just-concluded secret deal between the President of the Sudan and the Prime Minister of Ethiopia, huge swathes of our ancestral lands will be ceded to the Sudan.  These reports have been received with utter shock, resentment and anger by Ethiopians at home and abroad.  Neither the current generation of Ethiopians nor those of future generations will allow the deal to stand for it constitutes a serious violation of the treaty regime set up at the turn of the century and holds for naught the sacrifices of past generations of Ethiopians to preserve the territorial integrity of their country.  We wish to add that thousands of our people will be forced to lose their homes, farms and investments if the border deal is implemented without their participation and consent.
We are not unmindful that members of the United Nations and their sitting governments like those of the Sudan and Ethiopia are clothed with a certain degree of legitimacy in the eyes of international law and politics, even as such legitimacy deprives ordinary citizens adversely affected by the decisions of those who rule them legal standing and recourse in such matters. And yet the actions of these officials who purport to speak in their behalf are bereft of any legitimacy in the eyes of the very populace whose interests they claim to represent. This is particularly true when it concerns highly sensitive and emotionally charged questions of territorial sovereignty.  As such, the border deal of today hatched by unelected elites will be the ticking bomb of tomorrow.   Since it has neither support in law nor received the consent of the Ethiopian people, it will fester as a major source of friction and tension between the brotherly peoples of Ethiopia and the Sudan. Needless to add, the Horn of Africa region does not need an additional source of insecurity and instability beyond those that already plague the region. Accordingly, we wish to entreat Your Excellency to use your good offices to any extent appropriate and possible so as to forestall the dangerous situation the border deal is otherwise most likely to engender now or in the future if it goes into effect.
In any case, we would like to go on record as asserting our right to territorial sovereignty as defined by treaty – and not any other agreement that is reached behind the back of the Ethiopian people. We reserve the right to not honor any boundary that results from the agreement of an unelected government that is devoid of any support or legitimacy among its own people. In closing, we would like Your Excellency to know that the current extremely narrowly- based government of Ethiopia and the similarly discredited government of the Sudan are grasping at straws by using the border deal as a way of ensuring their political survival by a mutual exchange of promises foreswearing the use of their territories by organized movements seeking to overthrow their respective governments. This survival instinct underlies the parties’ desire to make a border deal and to keep it from public scrutiny without consideration of its impact on the people of Ethiopia.
Please accept the assurances of our highest consideration.
Sincerely,
  1. Ethiopian Border Affairs Committee (EBAC)
  2. Ethiopian People’s Congress for United Struggle (Shengo)
  3. Ethiopian People’s Revolutionary Party-Democratic (EPRP-D)
  4. Ethiopian Medhin Democratic Party (Medhin)
  5. All  Ethiopian Socialist Movement (ME’ISONE)
  6. Ethiopian People’s Patriotic Front (EPPF)
  7. Amara Democratic Movement Force (ADMF)
  8. Ethiopian Democratic Hibrehizb Unity Movement (EDHUM)
  9. Tatek Movement for Freedom, Democracy and Unity for Ethiopia
  10. Tigrean Alliance for National Democracy (TAND)
  11. Oromo Liberation Front (OLF)- led by General Kamal Galchuu
  12. Ethiopian National Transitional Council (ENTC)
  13. Moresh Wegenie Amara Organization (MWAO)
  14. The Legitimate Holy Synod of the Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahedo Church in Exile
  15. Gasha for Ethiopians
  16. Ethiopiawint: Council for the Defense of Citizens Right
  17. Beruh Ethiopia Democratic Movement
  18. Ethiopian Civic Consortium in UK
  19. Solidarity Committee for Ethiopian Political Prisoners – Canada (SOCEPP-Can)
  20. Ethiopian Civil Society Support Group in London, Ontario
  21. Anuak Justice Council
  22. Dallas Support Committee
  23. Solidarity Movement for a New Ethiopia (SMNE)
  24. Democracy For Ethiopia Forum in San Jose
  25. Ethio-Canada Democratic Forum in Ottawa
  26. Ethiopian Public Forum in Columbus, Ohio
  27. Mahdere Andinet Ethiopian Association
  28. Ethiopian Public Forum in Seattle, Washington
CC.
Embassy of the Republic of the Sudan
2210 Massachusetts Ave. NW
Washington, DC 20008
Dr. Nkosazana Dlamini Zuma
Chairperson of the African Union Commission
P. O. Box 3243
Roosvelt Street
(Old Airport Area)
W21K19
Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
Fax: 251-11-551-7844

New report calls on Ethiopia to reform repressive anti-terror law

IPI and partners also call for immediate release of five imprisoned journalists

VIENNA, Jan 14, 2014 – Ethiopia’s use of sweeping anti-terrorism law to imprison journalists and other legislative restrictions are hindering the development of free and independent media in Africa’s second largest country, according to a report published today by the International Press Institute (IPI).
Dozens of journalists and political activists have been arrested or sentenced under the Anti-Terrorism Proclamation of 2009, including five journalists who are serving prison sentences and who at times have been denied access to visitors and legal counsel. The report, “Press Freedom in Ethiopia”, is based on a mission to the country carried out in November by IPI and the World Association of Newspapers and News Publishers (WAN-IFRA).
“Despite a strong constitutional basis for press freedom and freedom of information, the Ethiopian government has systematically used the anti-terrorism law to prosecute and frighten journalists, which has put a straight-jacket on the media,” IPI Executive Director Alison Bethel McKenzie said. “Our joint mission also found a disturbing pattern of using other measures to control the press and restrict independent journalism, including restrictions on foreign media ownership and the absence of an independent public broadcaster.”
The report urges the Ethiopian government to free journalists convicted under the sedition provisions of the 2009 measure. These journalists include Solomon Kebede, Wubset Taye, Reyot Alemu, Eskinder Nega and Yusuf Getachew. Mission delegates were barred access to the journalists, who are being held at Kaliti Prison near the capital Addis Ababa.
The report urges the 547-member lower house of parliament to revamp the anti-terror law to ensure that it does not trample on the rights of freedom of speech and assembly provided under Article 29 of the Ethiopian Constitution and further guaranteed under the African Charter on Human and People’s Rights and the U.N. Human Rights Covenant, which Ethiopia has ratified.
In addition, the report:
  • Recommends that Ethiopian lawmakers review laws that bar foreign investment in media, measures that inhibit the development of an economically viable and diversified market.
  • Urges the courts to ensure that rulings restrict press freedom only in cases of intentional incitement or clear participation in acts of terrorism, and that judges act independently to protect the public’s right to be informed about political dissent and acts of terrorism.
  • Urges Ethiopia’s journalists and media owners to step up cooperation to improve professionalism and independence, and to form a unified front to defend press freedom.
The joint IPI/WAN-IFRA mission was carried from Nov. 3 to 6, just ahead of the African Media Leaders Forum (AMLF) in Addis Ababa. The organisations’ representatives met with more than 30 editors, journalists, lawyers, politicians and bloggers, as well as associates of the imprisoned journalists. The delegation also held meetings with the ambassadors of Austria and the United States, a senior African Union official, an Ethiopian lawmaker and government spokesman Redwan Hussien.
The organisations urged Prime Minister Hailemariam Desalegn to free the imprisoned journalists, some of whom are suffering from deteriorating health. In a joint statement issued immediately following the mission, IPI and WAN-IFRA also expressed their commitment to helping improve the professionalism, quality and independence of journalism in Ethiopia.
While the report highlights a long history of press freedom violations in Ethiopia, including a crackdown on journalists and opposition politicians following the country’s 2005 national elections, it notes that the 2009 anti-terrorism law has given the government expansive powers.
“The 2009 anti-terrorism law gave new powers to the government to arrest those deemed seditious, including journalists who step beyond the bounds of politically acceptable reporting or commentary,” the report says. “Armed with statutory authority, the government has not shied from using the laws to bludgeon opposition figures and journalists. Dozens of journalists have been imprisoned or accused of sedition or fomenting unrest, forcing many to flee the country.”
The report notes other forms of pressure by the government. Independent journalists recalled being the target of smear campaigns by state-run media, while editors recounted that managers of the government-run printing press refused to print editions of newspapers containing controversial articles.
The report does note positive developments, such as the growth in advertising and readership for some of the country’s leading independent newspapers. Journalists and newspaper publishers also expressed a desire to improve professionalism, quality and solidarity; although they added that government pressure and laws continue to create hurdles to self-regulation and cooperation.
“We came away from Ethiopia recognising the tremendous potential for a highly competitive, professional and successful media market in Ethiopia,” Bethel McKenzie said. “But to make this happen, the Ethiopian government must remove the roadblocks, starting with the release of imprisoned journalists and then conduct a thorough review of the laws to ensure that reporting on legitimate criticism or dissent is not grounds for prosecution.”
For more information, contact Timothy Spence, senior IPI press freedom advisor for the Middle East and Africa, at +43 (1) 512 9011 or email tspence[@]freemedia.at.
posted by Daniel tesfaye